43 Cited authorities

Jones v. Bock
549 U.S. 199 (2007) Cited 12,711 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that PLRA exhaustion is mandatory, and prisoners cannot bring unexhausted claims into federal court
Ross v. Blake
578 U.S. 632 (2016) Cited 6,412 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, other than the requirement that a remedy be "available," the text of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") "suggests no limits on an inmate's obligation to exhaust -- irrespective of any ‘special circumstances’ "
Booth v. Churner
532 U.S. 731 (2001) Cited 11,076 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that prisoner had to exhaust available administrative procedures even though they could not result in the relief he sought, namely damages
Los Angeles v. Lyons
461 U.S. 95 (1983) Cited 7,495 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold
Olim v. Wakinekona
461 U.S. 238 (1983) Cited 4,716 times
Holding that the discretionary nature of the prison decision at issue negated any state-created liberty interest in the prison regulations that required a particular kind of hearing before the decision could be made
Meachum v. Fano
427 U.S. 215 (1976) Cited 6,564 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that an inmate lacked due process protections in his transfer between prisons, resulting in a reclassification to maximum security, because the transfer was "within the normal limits or range of custody which the conviction has authorized the State to impose"
Ingraham v. Wright
430 U.S. 651 (1977) Cited 4,005 times
Holding that reasonable "corporal punishment serves important educational interests" and is therefore permissible in public schools
Hare v. City of Corinth
74 F.3d 633 (5th Cir. 1996) Cited 1,587 times
Holding that the state owes a duty under the Due Process Clause "to provide both pretrial detainees and convicted inmates with basic human needs, including medical care and protection from harm, during their confinement "
Brown v. Callahan
623 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2010) Cited 648 times
Holding that plaintiff has burden of rebutting qualified-immunity defense once defendant raises it
Maryland v. King
567 U.S. 1301 (2012) Cited 191 times
Finding irreparable harm while acknowledging respondent's argument that petitioner's "eight-week delay in applying for a stay undermine[d] its allegation of irreparable harm" was a "sound point[]"
Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Cited 485,656 times 688 Legal Analyses
Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
Section 1997e - Suits by prisoners
42 U.S.C. § 1997e Cited 53,620 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that prisoners must exhaust "available" administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court

J.H. v. Edwards

43 Cited authorities

Holding that PLRA exhaustion is mandatory, and prisoners cannot bring unexhausted claims into federal court

Holding that, other than the requirement that a remedy be "available," the text of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") "suggests no limits on an inmate's obligation to exhaust -- irrespective of any ‘special circumstances’ "

Holding that prisoner had to exhaust available administrative procedures even though they could not result in the relief he sought, namely damages

Holding there is no justiciable controversy where plaintiff had once been subjected to a chokehold

Holding that the discretionary nature of the prison decision at issue negated any state-created liberty interest in the prison regulations that required a particular kind of hearing before the decision could be made

Holding that an inmate lacked due process protections in his transfer between prisons, resulting in a reclassification to maximum security, because the transfer was "within the normal limits or range of custody which the conviction has authorized the State to impose"

Holding that reasonable "corporal punishment serves important educational interests" and is therefore permissible in public schools

Holding that the state owes a duty under the Due Process Clause "to provide both pretrial detainees and convicted inmates with basic human needs, including medical care and protection from harm, during their confinement "

Holding that plaintiff has burden of rebutting qualified-immunity defense once defendant raises it

Finding irreparable harm while acknowledging respondent's argument that petitioner's "eight-week delay in applying for a stay undermine[d] its allegation of irreparable harm" was a "sound point[]"

Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

Holding that prisoners must exhaust "available" administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court