8 Cited authorities

  1. American Manufacturers Mutual v. Schaefer

    124 S.W.3d 154 (Tex. 2003)   Cited 546 times
    Finding that the ordinary meaning of "repair" in an automobile policy means only to "bring back to good or useable condition" and does not include "diminished value"
  2. Religious of Sacred Heart of Texas v. Houston

    836 S.W.2d 606 (Tex. 1992)   Cited 90 times
    Holding that any complaint as to the wording of the jury charge is waived if a proper objection is not made in the trial court
  3. Singleton v. Elephant Ins. Co.

    953 F.3d 334 (5th Cir. 2020)   Cited 17 times
    Finding that, pursuant to Texas state law, "actual cash value" means "fair market value" and does not include Regulatory Fees
  4. Tolar v. Allstate Tex. Lloyd's Co.

    772 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2011)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that sales tax can be depreciated because it follows the depreciation on the underlying property
  5. Crisp v. Security Nat. Ins. Co.

    369 S.W.2d 326 (Tex. 1963)   Cited 75 times
    Holding that when an insurance policy provides that it can be cancelled upon written notice, the cancellation is not effective unless the notice is received
  6. Greenspoint Investors, Ltd. v. Travelers Lloyds Ins. Co.

    Civil Action No. H-10-4057 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2015)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. H-10-4057 03-03-2015 GREENSPOINT INVESTORS, LTD., AND GREENSPOINT WEST, LTD., Plaintiffs, v. TRAVELERS LLOYDS INSURANCE CO., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the court are the following motions: (1) Travelers Lloyds Insurance Company's ("Travelers") Motion in Limine Regarding Application of the Policy's Inflation Guard Coverage (Doc. 162); (2) Travelers' Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence Related to Repairs to the Fiber Optics Room (Doc. 163); (3) Travelers' Motion

  7. Great Tex. Cty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lewis

    979 S.W.2d 72 (Tex. App. 1998)   Cited 12 times
    Finding the words "repair or replace" mean restoring to a condition substantially the same as that existing before the damage
  8. Sullivan v. Gist

    159 F. Supp. 928 (E.D. Pa. 1958)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 20369. March 11, 1958. Benjamin Pomerantz, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. John B. Hannum, III, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant. James J. Leyden, Philadelphia, Pa., for third-party defendant. LORD, District Judge. This action arises from the collision of an automobile driven by George Gist, the defendant, and a Yellow Cab. The plaintiffs, Robert and Wallace Sullivan, husband and wife, were passengers in defendant's car and are suing to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly