23 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 252,377 times 279 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 266,313 times 365 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Fowler v. UPMC Shadyside
578 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2009) Cited 14,072 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"
Frederico v. Home Depot
507 F.3d 188 (3d Cir. 2007) Cited 2,216 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding a dismissal order "without prejudice" was a final order because the plaintiff elected to stand on her original complaint rather than amend or refile it
Gennari v. Weichert Co. Realtors
148 N.J. 582 (N.J. 1997) Cited 864 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff can sufficiently plead an affirmative misrepresentation in violation of the CFA without allegations regarding defendant's intent or knowledge
Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.
148 N.J. 396 (N.J. 1997) Cited 552 times
Holding that implied covenant means that "neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract."
Wilson v. Amerada Hess Corp.
168 N.J. 236 (N.J. 2001) Cited 460 times
Holding party may breach implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing even where party has not breached underlying contract
Lobiondo v. Schwartz
199 N.J. 62 (N.J. 2009) Cited 232 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the absence of probable cause is an essential element of a malicious prosecution claim and failure to prove it is fatal to the claim
Russo v. Nagel
358 N.J. Super. 254 (App. Div. 2003) Cited 135 times
Holding that the criminal statute prohibiting theft by extortion did not create a civil cause of action
Schaffhauser v. Citibank
340 F. App'x 128 (3d Cir. 2009) Cited 83 times
Holding that ongoing debt-collection litigation does not constitute a continuing violation of the FDCPA

STRANSKY v. PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC et al

23 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion "in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule"

Holding a dismissal order "without prejudice" was a final order because the plaintiff elected to stand on her original complaint rather than amend or refile it

Holding that a plaintiff can sufficiently plead an affirmative misrepresentation in violation of the CFA without allegations regarding defendant's intent or knowledge

Holding that implied covenant means that "neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract."

Holding party may breach implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing even where party has not breached underlying contract

Holding that the absence of probable cause is an essential element of a malicious prosecution claim and failure to prove it is fatal to the claim

Holding that the criminal statute prohibiting theft by extortion did not create a civil cause of action

Holding that ongoing debt-collection litigation does not constitute a continuing violation of the FDCPA