32 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,626 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,542 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Manzarek v. Marine

    519 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 2,716 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in evaluating a complaint on a motion to dismiss, the court “accept factual allegations in the complaint as true and construe the pleadings in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
  4. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

    35 Cal.4th 797 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 1,242 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[r]esolution of the statute of limitations issue is normally a question of fact."
  5. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.

    7 Cal.4th 503 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 1,174 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there is no separate cause of action for civil conspiracy, and that to establish such an action, a plaintiff must show some other underlying tort or civil wrong
  6. United States v. Texas

    507 U.S. 529 (1993)   Cited 283 times
    Holding that silence in a statute "falls far short of an expression of legislative intent to supplant the existing common law in that area"
  7. Gilbrook v. City of Westminster

    177 F.3d 839 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 681 times
    Holding that speech regarding public safety implications of city's decision to reduce fire department budget involved matter of public concern
  8. Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. U.S.

    68 F.3d 1204 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 694 times
    Holding that a "complaint cannot be dismissed unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts that would establish the timeliness of the claim"
  9. Jablon v. Dean Witter Co.

    614 F.2d 677 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 827 times
    Holding complaint may be dismissed on statute of limitations grounds where allegations therein, even when read with required liberality, would not permit plaintiff to prove statute was tolled
  10. In re Vantive Corp. Securities Litigation

    283 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 347 times
    Holding that, although a sale of 74% was suspicious, a strong inference was not raised because analysis of the remaining factors did not raise suspicion
  11. Section 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers

    18 U.S.C. § 1030   Cited 3,226 times   408 Legal Analyses
    Holding cellular phones are protected
  12. Section 1836 - Civil proceedings

    18 U.S.C. § 1836   Cited 1,836 times   142 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts original, but not exclusive, jurisdiction over civil actions brought under the DTSA
  13. Section 339 - Contract, obligation not founded on written instrument; against sheriff or coroner for doing official act; rescission of contract not in writing

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 339   Cited 1,514 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must initiate within two years "[a]n action upon a contract, obligation or liability not founded upon an instrument of writing"
  14. Section 3426 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 3426   Cited 555 times   6 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 3426 Added by Stats. 1984, Ch. 1724, Sec. 1.

  15. Section 1832 - Theft of trade secrets

    18 U.S.C. § 1832   Cited 404 times   93 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that trade secret “relate to” or be “included in” product