§Why CasetextPricing

California Trucking Association et al v. Becerra et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint

24 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,626 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 27,829 times   138 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  3. Summers v. Earth Island Inst.

    555 U.S. 488 (2009)   Cited 2,998 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that supplementation of the district court record to receive affidavits from the organization's members was not permitted "in the circumstances here: after the trial is over, judgment has been entered, and a notice of appeal has been filed"

  4. American Trucking v. City of Los Angeles

    559 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,264 times
    Holding plaintiff seeking injunction "not entitled to relief" in absence of showing "likelihood of irreparable harm"

  5. Schneider v. California Department of Corr

    151 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 1,336 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding inmates “possess a constitutionally cognizable property interest” in the interest earned on money held in their prison accounts

  6. Thomas v. Anchorage Equal Rights Com'n

    220 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 668 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that issues presented must be “definite and concrete, not hypothetical or abstract”—that plaintiffs “face a realistic danger of sustaining a direct injury as a result of the statute's operation or enforcement,” rather than an imaginary or speculative injury

  7. Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court

    4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018)   Cited 193 times   143 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a hiring entity's failure to prove any one of these three prerequisites is sufficient to establish that a worker is an employee, rather than an independent contractor

  8. S.G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Dep't of Indus. Relations

    48 Cal.3d 341 (Cal. 1989)   Cited 444 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that temporary “sharefarmers” were employees entitled to workers' compensation coverage

  9. Skaff v. Meridien North America

    506 F.3d 832 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a delay in providing a disabled person a hotel room with a roll-in shower and shower chair was not a denial of access

  10. Nat'l Council of La Raza v. Cegavske

    800 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2015)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that plaintiff organization was not required to identify specific members injured “[w]here it [was] relatively clear, rather than merely speculative, that one or more members ha[d] been or w[ould] be adversely affected by defendant's action,” and where the identity of particular members was not necessary for the defendant to “understand and respond” to the claim of injury

  11. Section 213 - Exemptions

    29 U.S.C. § 213   Cited 4,604 times   252 Legal Analyses
    Exempting salaried employees from the FLSA's overtime pay requirement

  12. Section 31141 - Review and preemption of State laws and regulations

    49 U.S.C. § 31141   Cited 38 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the remedies "are in addition to other remedies provided by law"

  13. Section 11090 - Order Regulating Wages, Hours, and Working Conditions in the Transportation Industry

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8 § 11090   Cited 196 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing employee "shall not be employed more than eight hours in any workday or more than 40 hours in any workweek unless" employee is paid overtime