Ashcroft v. Iqbal

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Papasan v. Allain

Holding that Ex parte Young would not support a suit against a state for ongoing liability for an alleged past breach of trust, since "continuing payment of the income from the lost corpus is essentially equivalent in economic terms to a one-time restoration of the lost corpus itself"

Lee v. City of L.A.

Holding that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss "by relying on extrinsic evidence and by taking judicial notice of disputed matters of fact to support its ruling"

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.

Holding that an antitrust injury is an injury that is "attributable to an anti-competitive aspect of the practice under scrutiny"

Bates v. State Bar of Arizona

Holding that a state rule barring lawyers from advertising their services was not challengeable under the Sherman Act but also that the state rule, as applied, violated the attorneys' First Amendment free speech rights

Wilson v. Hewlett–Packard Co.

Holding that where a defendant has not made an affirmative misrepresentation, a plaintiff must allege the existence of an unreasonable safety hazard and a causal connection between the defect and the hazard

Somers ex rel. Herself v. Apple, Inc.

Holding that plaintiff's theory was "implausible in the face of contradictory . . . facts alleged in her complaint"

Kendall v. Visa

Holding that leave to amend would be futile where plaintiff was granted leave to amend once before and the amended complaint contained the same deficiencies as the prior complaint

Parker v. Brown

Holding that restraints imposed by the state "as an act of government" are immune from antitrust liability

Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."

Section 15 - Suits by persons injured

Granting private right of action to anyone who has been injured "by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws ..."

Section 2 - Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty

In § 2 cases under the Sherman Act, as in § 7 cases under the Clayton Act (Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325) there may be submarkets that are separate economic entities.

Section 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty

Forbidding every "contract, combination . . . or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States"

Section 12-341.01 - Recovery of attorney fees

Permitting an award of reasonable attorney's fees to the successful party in a contested action arising out of express or implied contract

Section 26 - Injunctive relief for private parties; exception; costs

Authorizing injunctive relief against "threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws"

Section 35 - Recovery of damages, etc., for antitrust violations from any local government, or official or employee thereof acting in an official capacity

Prohibiting the recovery of damages for antitrust violations from local governments and officials

Section 34 - Definitions applicable to sections 34 to 36

Defining "local government" to include various entities "established by State law in one or more States"

Section 28-8424 - Nonprofit corporation lessees; status; authority; exemptions

Section 28-8423 - Airport land lease; nonprofit corporation