10 Cited authorities

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders

    437 U.S. 340 (1978)   Cited 4,393 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that that the production of putative class members' names pursuant to Federal Rule 26 was not "within the scope of legitimate discovery."
  2. Hickman v. Taylor

    329 U.S. 495 (1947)   Cited 6,496 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the context of the work product privilege that the adversary system requires a party's attorney be permitted to “assemble information, sift what he considers to be the relevant from the irrelevant facts, prepare his legal theories and plan his strategy without undue and needless interference”
  3. Schlagenhauf v. Holder

    379 U.S. 104 (1964)   Cited 1,414 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "good cause" standard of Fed. R. Civ. P. 35 requires "affirmative showing by the movant"
  4. Lewis v. ACB Business Services, Inc.

    135 F.3d 389 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 1,493 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a company whose principal purpose is to extend credit rather than collect debts is not a debt collector under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act
  5. Siriano v. Goodman Mfg. Co.

    Civil Action 2:14-cv-1131 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 9, 2015)   Cited 36 times

    Civil Action 2:14-cv-1131 12-09-2015 ROCCO SIRIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOODMAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, L.P., et al., Defendants. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers Judge George C. Smith OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs bring this breach of warranty, products liability, and consumer protection action against Defendants, alleging that the evaporator coils and condenser coils found in Defendants' air conditioners, air handlers and heat pumps have defects that cause "premature corrosion and holes or

  6. Marsico v. Sears Holding Corp.

    370 F. App'x 658 (6th Cir. 2010)   Cited 11 times

    No. 07-2231. March 25, 2010. On appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Before: COLE, CLAY, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges. OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff David Marsico appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Sears Holding Corporation, formerly known as Kmart Holding Corporation, on his claims of discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 622 et seq., and the Michigan Elliott-Larsen

  7. Mitchell v. Universal Music Grp. Inc.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-174-JHM (W.D. Ky. Mar. 30, 2018)   Cited 4 times
    Noting that it is "high time" that the tradition of preserving boilerplate objections be ended
  8. Cobbler Nev., LLC v. Doe

    Case No. 15-12771 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 1, 2015)

    Case No. 15-12771 12-01-2015 COBBLER NEVADA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-30, Defendant. Paul D. Borman United States District Judge OPINION AND ORDER (1) SEVERING DOE DEFENDANTS 2-30; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS AS TO DOE DEFENDANT 1 (ECF NO. 2) On August 6, 2015, Plaintiff Cobbler Nevada, LLC filed an action against thirty Doe Defendants, identified only by their subscriber Internet Protocol addresses ("IP addresses"), alleging that these Doe

  9. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,025 times   653 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  10. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,925 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness