§Why CasetextPricing

Horner et al v. American Airlines Inc et al

REPLY

18 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,626 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Beard v. Banks

    548 U.S. 521 (2006)   Cited 1,692 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that encouraging progress toward rehabilitation serves legitimate penological objectives

  3. Ramming v. U.S.

    281 F.3d 158 (5th Cir. 2001)   Cited 3,362 times
    Holding that a court ruling on a Rule 12(b) motion may evaluate “ the complaint alone, the complaint supplemented by undisputed facts evidenced in the record, or the complaint supplemented by undisputed facts plus the court's resolution of disputed facts”

  4. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,061 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

  5. Friou v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

    948 F.2d 972 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 190 times
    Holding that summary judgment is proper where the record as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party

  6. Mitchell v. Contin. Airlines

    481 F.3d 225 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 26 times
    Approving dismissal of suit without prejudice on summary judgment for failure to exhaust

  7. MacKenzie v. Castro

    Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-0752-D (N.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2017)   Cited 6 times

    Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-0752-D 03-16-2017 CRAIG STEVEN MacKENZIE, Plaintiff, v. JULIAN CASTRO, SECRETARY, U.S. HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants. SIDNEY A. FITZWATER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants Julian Castro ("Secretary Castro"), Shaun Donovan ("Secretary Donovan"), and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") (collectively, "the HUD Defendants") move to dismiss the claims of pro se plaintiff Craig Steven MacKenzie ("MacKenzie")

  8. In re Continental Airlines

    484 F.3d 173 (3d Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 05-1053, 05-1096. Argued September 14, 2006. Opinion Filed April 24, 2007. Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Mary F. Walrath, J. John O'B. Clarke, Jr. (Argued), Highsaw, Mahoney Clarke, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Michael Weglarz (Argued), Alpharetta, GA, Pro se. Jon A. Geier, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky Walker LLP, Washington, D.C., Robert S. Brady, Joseph M. Barry (Argued), Young, Conaway, Stargatt Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Continental

  9. Krakowski v. Am. Airlines, Inc. (In re Amr Corp.)

    Case No. 11-15463 (SHL) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jun. 3, 2014)   Cited 5 times

    Case No. 11-15463 (SHL) Adv. Pro. No. 13-01283 (SHL) 06-03-2014 In re: AMR CORPORATION, et al., Reorganized Debtors JOHN KRAKOWSKI, KEVIN HORNER, and M. ALICIA SIKES, individually, and on behalf of thos similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and ALLIED PILOTS ASSOCIATION, Defendants, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, As Intervenor. GREEN JACOBSON, P.C. Counsel for Plaintiffs By: Allen P. Press, Esq. JAMES & HOFFMAN Counsel for Allied Pilots Association By: Edgar N. James

  10. Mackenzie v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n

    598 F. App'x 223 (5th Cir. 2014)   Cited 4 times
    Applying Mitchell and holding that individual pilots lacked standing to challenge an arbitration award

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,681 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 153 - National Railroad Adjustment Board

    45 U.S.C. § 153   Cited 1,580 times
    Stating that parties may void contracts in certain instances of unilateral mistake