8 Cited authorities

  1. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.

    975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 6,194 times
    Holding the "good cause" standard of Rule 16 controls after a scheduling order establishes the pleading timetable
  2. Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co.

    302 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 2,159 times
    Holding that pro se plaintiff's good faith mistake of law amounted to mere inadvertence, and did not warrant relief from an untimely jury demand
  3. Ascon Properties, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co.

    866 F.2d 1149 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 1,321 times
    Holding that the ninety-day notice requirement is jurisdictional
  4. Intl Ass'n of Mach Aer. W. v. Republic Air

    761 F.2d 1386 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 132 times

    No. 84-1688. Argued and Submitted December 14, 1984. Decided May 24, 1985. John Clark, Jr., Highsaw Mahoney, P.C., Washington, D.C., Stanley Lubin, Treon, Warnicke Roush, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant. Kevin O'Malley, Michael K. Kennedy, Gallagher Kennedy, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge, HUG, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge. The International

  5. Chao v. Westside Drywall, Inc.

    709 F. Supp. 2d 1037 (D. Or. 2010)   Cited 57 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that declarations not made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746 were inadmissible
  6. Mountain View Pharmacy v. Abbott Lab

    630 F.2d 1383 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 125 times
    Holding that rule 15's requirement that leave to amend be freely given is inapplicable when futility of amendment is apparent
  7. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 33,726 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
  8. Section 31105 - Employee protections

    49 U.S.C. § 31105   Cited 176 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Stating that "[a]ll complaints initiated under this section shall be governed by the legal burdens of proof set forth in section 42121(b)"