§Why CasetextPricing

Inguran, LLC et al v. ABS Global, Inc. et al

Brief in Reply

5 Cited authorities

  1. Cont. Airlines v. Goodyear Tire Rubber

    819 F.2d 1519 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 144 times
    Holding that an "exculpatory clause" does not violate California Civil Code section 1668 where the clause bars suit, but "[o]ther sanctions remain in place"

  2. W.L. Gore v. Intern. Med Prosthetics Research

    975 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 74 times
    Holding district court's order finding patent invalid was final, appealable decision under § 1295

  3. Cadillac Fairview/California, Inc. v. United States

    41 F.3d 562 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 60 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party that sold a product to another party "arranged for disposal" of a hazardous substance

  4. Interdigital Commc'ns, Inc. v. ZTE Corp.

    Civil Action No. 13-009-RGA (D. Del. Jun. 7, 2016)

    Civil Action No. 13-009-RGA 06-07-2016 INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, IPR LICENSING, INC., and INTERDIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiffs; v. ZTE CORPORATION and ZTE (USA) INC., Defendants. Neal C. Belgam, Esq., Clarissa R. Chenoweth, Esq., Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ron E. Shulman, Esq., Latham & Watkins LLP, Menlo Park, CA; Maximilian A. Grant, Esq., Bert C. Reiser, Esq., Jonathan D. Link, Esq., Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C.;

  5. WIAV SOLUTIONS LLC v. MOTOROLA, INC.

    Civil NO. 3:09cv447 (E.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2010)

    Civil NO. 3:09cv447. March 8, 2010 MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT PAYNE, District Judge This matter is before the Court on WiAV's MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(b) (Docket No. 207). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted. BACKGROUND The Plaintiff, WiAV Solutions LLC, ("WiAV") brought this patent infringement action against the Defendants, Motorola, Inc., Nokia, Inc., Nokia Corp., Palm Inc., Personal Communications Devices LLC, Personal Communications Devices Holdings LLC, Sony