§Why CasetextPricing

Wallace v. Leidos Innovations Corporation et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION for Summary Judgment

16 Cited authorities

  1. Associated General Contractors v. Carpenters

    459 U.S. 519 (1983)   Cited 5,032 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union lacked standing to sue for injuries passed on to it by intermediaries

  2. Trau-Med v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    71 S.W.3d 691 (Tenn. 2002)   Cited 575 times
    Holding that an insurer can be liable "for the acts or omissions of an attorney hired to represent an insured when those acts or omissions were, at least in part, directed, commanded, or knowingly authorized by the insurer"

  3. Haynes v. Hamilton County

    883 S.W.2d 606 (Tenn. 1994)   Cited 148 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding officers pursuit decisions subject to reasonableness analysis

  4. Forrester v. Stockstill

    869 S.W.2d 328 (Tenn. 1994)   Cited 138 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a procurement of a breach of contract claim failed because "[i]n Tennessee, unless there is a contract of employment for a definite term, a discharged employee may not recover against an employer for breach of contract because there is no contractual right to continued employment."

  5. Booker v. GTE.net LLC

    350 F.3d 515 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 90 times
    Holding the court need not accept as true legal conclusions and unwarranted factual inferences

  6. Thompson v. Orange Lake Country Club, Inc.

    224 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (M.D. Fla. 2002)   Cited 28 times
    Denying summary judgment and ordering parties to review and submit relevant portions of worksharing agreement, where neither side offered agreement with motion materials

  7. Smith v. Harriman Utility Board

    26 S.W.3d 879 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that a supervisor with the authority to hire and fire was not an "employer" under the TPPA and, therefore, could not be sued in his individual capacity under that act

  8. Hugo v. Millennium Labs., Inc.

    590 F. App'x 541 (6th Cir. 2014)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14-5132 10-31-2014 JOSHUA HUGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. BOGGS, Circuit Judge. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0825n.06 ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE BEFORE: BOGGS, SUTTON and STRANCH, Circuit Judges. BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Joshua Hugo appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to his former employer on his claims of retaliatory

  9. Ladd v. Roane Hosiery, Inc.

    556 S.W.2d 758 (Tenn. 1977)   Cited 59 times
    Implying that employee acting within scope of employment duties is not liable for procurement of breach of contract between employer and plaintiff

  10. Hugo v. Millennium Labs., Inc.

    993 F. Supp. 2d 812 (E.D. Tenn. 2014)   Cited 7 times

    No. 3:12–CV–167–TAV–HBG. 2014-01-6 Joshua HUGO, Plaintiff, v. MILLENNIUM LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. Arthur F. Knight, III, Taylor, Fleishman, & Knight, Knoxville, TN, for Plaintiff. John J. Park, Robert E. Boston, Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, PLLC, Nashville, TN, for Defendant. THOMAS A. VARLAN Arthur F. Knight, III, Taylor, Fleishman, & Knight, Knoxville, TN, for Plaintiff. John J. Park, Robert E. Boston, Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, PLLC, Nashville, TN, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

  11. Rule 802 - The Rule Against Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 802   Cited 3,825 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing federal statutes, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or Supreme Court rules as sources for exceptions to the rule against hearsay