§Why CasetextPricing

Aya Healthcare Services, Inc. et al v. AMN Healthcare, Inc.

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint

35 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,626 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,542 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.

    495 U.S. 328 (1990)   Cited 834 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an antitrust injury is an injury that is "attributable to an anti-competitive aspect of the practice under scrutiny"

  4. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.

    551 U.S. 877 (2007)   Cited 459 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding that vertical agreements are not per se illegal

  5. Pac. Bell Tel. Co. v. Linkline Commc'ns, Inc.

    555 U.S. 438 (2009)   Cited 401 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "price-squeezing" claims not cognizable under the Sherman Act

  6. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

    468 U.S. 85 (1984)   Cited 664 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NCAA restrictions on televising college football games are subject to Rule of Reason analysis for the “critical” reason that “horizontal restraints on competition are essential if the product is to be available at all”

  7. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.

    472 U.S. 585 (1985)   Cited 606 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that predatory conduct to attain or preserve a monopoly is a prerequisite to a finding of monopolization or attempted monopolization

  8. Business Electronics v. Sharp Electronics

    485 U.S. 717 (1988)   Cited 508 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a vertical restraint of trade is not per se illegal under § 1 of the Sherman Act unless it includes some agreement on price or price levels

  9. Major League Baseball v. Salvino

    542 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 915 times
    Holding adequate foundation for business records exception laid in similar affidavit

  10. Texaco v. Dagher

    547 U.S. 1 (2006)   Cited 245 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Finding such an agreement reasonable and not anti-competitive for purposes of § 1 liability