7 Cited authorities

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.

    435 U.S. 589 (1978)   Cited 3,922 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing" can constitute a sufficient reason to preserve records under seal
  2. Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 2,121 times
    Holding that the Phillips exception is "expressly limited to the status of materials . . . attached to a non-dispositive motion"
  3. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC

    809 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2016)   Cited 864 times
    Holding that the "compelling reasons" standard applies to any motion that "is more than tangentially related to the merits of a case"
  4. In re Electronic Arts

    298 F. App'x 568 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 158 times
    Holding that "pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed minimum payment terms" are trade secrets that is appropriate for sealing
  5. In re Qualcomm Litig.

    Case No. 3:17-cv-0108-GPC-MDD (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2017)   Cited 22 times
    Finding compelling reasons to seal where the parties, through declarations from company officers, "provide[d] the Court with a factual basis for their claims that disclosing information subject to confidentiality agreements would harm the parties' respective competition standings"
  6. Velasco v. Chrysler Grp. LLC

    Case No. CV 13-08080 DDP (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2017)   Cited 3 times
    Sealing "technical data pertaining to efforts to understand failures in [the product that] are inextricably intertwined with information about Chrysler's technical capacity"
  7. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 64,042 times   481 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37