6 Cited authorities

Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana
936 F.2d 1027 (9th Cir. 1990) Cited 669 times
Holding that the district court had the authority to correct a prior judgment under Rule 60 since there was no reason in the record to doubt the district judge's statements of his prior intent
Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.
364 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 386 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding magistrate judge's entry of protective order precluding defendant employer from using discovery process to support after-acquired evidence defense proper, noting that "the McKennon Court did not hold that depositions could be conducted for the purpose of uncovering illegal actions."
Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.
232 F.R.D. 633 (C.D. Cal. 2005) Cited 238 times
Finding subpoena imposed undue burden because discovery sought could be obtained from a party in the case
BARRINGTON v. MORTAGE IT, INC
CASE NO. 07-61304-CIV-COHN/SELTZER (S.D. Fla. Dec. 10, 2007) Cited 25 times
Quashing subpoena requesting personnel records to assess plaintiff credibility where plaintiffs had brought lawsuit against prior employer as "defendant has not alleged any reason to believe that the plaintiff has misrepresented information."
Blotzer v. L-3 Commc'ns Corp.
No. CV-11-274-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Dec. 5, 2012) Cited 5 times
Listing five conditions for application of a FWW arrangement: “ the employee's hours must fluctuate from week to week, the employee must receive a fixed salary, the salary must meet the minimum wage standards, the employee and the employer must have a clear mutual understanding that the salary (not including overtime premiums) is fixed regardless of the number of hours the employee works, and the employee must receive overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of forty hours, not less than one-half the rate of pay”
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,578 times 650 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

Uehling v. Millennium Laboratories, Inc. et al

6 Cited authorities

Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana

Holding that the district court had the authority to correct a prior judgment under Rule 60 since there was no reason in the record to doubt the district judge's statements of his prior intent

Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.

Finding magistrate judge's entry of protective order precluding defendant employer from using discovery process to support after-acquired evidence defense proper, noting that "the McKennon Court did not hold that depositions could be conducted for the purpose of uncovering illegal actions."

Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.

Finding subpoena imposed undue burden because discovery sought could be obtained from a party in the case

BARRINGTON v. MORTAGE IT, INC

Quashing subpoena requesting personnel records to assess plaintiff credibility where plaintiffs had brought lawsuit against prior employer as "defendant has not alleged any reason to believe that the plaintiff has misrepresented information."

Blotzer v. L-3 Commc'ns Corp.

Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37