Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.
435 U.S. 589 (1978) Cited 5,991 times 9 Legal AnalysesHolding that "business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing" can constitute a sufficient reason to preserve records under seal
Brennan v. Opus Bank, Corp.
796 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2015) Cited 483 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that the plaintiff's unconscionability claim was for the arbitrator to decide because the plaintiff "failed to make any arguments specific to the delegation provision and instead argued that the [arbitration provision] as a whole [was] unconscionable"
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.
727 F.3d 1214 (Fed. Cir. 2013) Cited 390 timesHolding that detailed product-specific financial information, including costs, sales and profits merited sealing as confidential information
Hagestad v. Tragesser
49 F.3d 1430 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 695 timesHolding that even though the district court had announced that it would oversee the drafting of settlement papers and the construction and execution of the settlement, it had not retained jurisdiction
McDonnell v. Southwest
292 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2008) Cited 1 timesNo. 06-56089. Argued and Submitted March 3, 2008. Filed September 11, 2008. Richard C. Binder, Pasadena, CA, Gretchen M. Nelson, Kreindler and Kreidler, LLP, Ronald L. Goldman, Baum, Hedlund, Aristei, Guilford Schiavo, Haig P. Ashikian, Mooradian Ashikian, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel Rose, Kreindler Kreindler, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. Ruth M. Moore, Donald L. Zachary, Spillane, Shaeffer, Aronoff, Bandlow LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Intervenor-Appellant. Melora M. Garrison, Ronald A. McIntire, Perkins