§Why CasetextPricing

Podurgiel v. Acme Markets Inc.

MOTION for Summary Judgment Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Complaint

26 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 237,052 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,366 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision

  3. Fuentes v. Perskie

    32 F.3d 759 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 3,779 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff can challenge a legitimate reason for an employment action by showing, inter alia, that the employer treated other, similarly situated persons not of her protected class more favorably

  4. Conoshenti v. Public Service Elec. Gas

    364 F.3d 135 (3d Cir. 2004)   Cited 1,460 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a request for medical leave is a protected activity under the ADA

  5. Lichtenstein v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Med. Ctr.

    691 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2012)   Cited 713 times
    Holding that whether the case could proceed under a mixed-motive instruction was not relevant because the case could proceed under "the more taxing McDonnell Douglas standard"

  6. Capps v. Mondelez Global, LLC

    847 F.3d 144 (3d Cir. 2017)   Cited 303 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding an ADA failure-to-accommodate claim requires evidence that the employee "requested an accommodation or assistance"

  7. Victor v. State

    203 N.J. 383 (N.J. 2010)   Cited 332 times
    Applying McDonnell Douglas to a failure to accommodate NJLAD disability claim

  8. Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.

    182 N.J. 436 (N.J. 2005)   Cited 347 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the prima facie case for gender discrimination under the NJLAD mirrors that under Title VII

  9. Thomas v. Town of Hammonton

    351 F.3d 108 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 304 times
    Holding three weeks insufficient

  10. Viscik v. Fowler Equipment

    173 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2002)   Cited 317 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obese plaintiff had established physical handicap within the meaning of the NJLAD

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,940 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Section 2601 - Findings and purposes

    29 U.S.C. § 2601   Cited 7,662 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Finding that there is inadequate job security for employees who have serious health conditions that prevent them from working for temporary periods

  13. Section 363 - Use, sale, or lease of property

    11 U.S.C. § 363   Cited 7,100 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Granting trustee authority, after notice and hearing, to sell property of estate

  14. Section 2612 - Leave requirement

    29 U.S.C. § 2612   Cited 4,957 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Granting qualifying employees twelve weeks of FMLA leave in a 12-month period

  15. Section 825.107 - Successor in interest coverage

    29 C.F.R. § 825.107   Cited 47 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing eight factors for evaluating whether an entity qualifies as a successor in interest