Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.
74 N.Y.2d 487 (N.Y. 1989) Cited 1,378 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding that the plaintiff could not recover attorneys' fees from the defendant without express language in the agreement permitting such a recovery
Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Ins. Co.
98 N.Y.2d 208 (N.Y. 2002) Cited 436 times 21 Legal AnalysesHolding that indemnity should be allocated pro rata
Olin Corp. v. Am. Home Assurance Co.
704 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2012) Cited 217 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that under New York law, courts are to apply the general rules of contract interpretation
Raymond Corp. v. Natl. Union Fire Ins. of Pitt.
5 N.Y.3d 157 (N.Y. 2005) Cited 116 times95. Argued May 3, 2005. Decided June 29, 2005. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered April 1, 2004. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, an order of the Supreme Court, Chenango County (Kevin M. Dowd, J.), which had denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and granted defendant judgment on its counterclaim;
Olin Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America
221 F.3d 307 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 94 times 2 Legal AnalysesFinding that an insurer did not provide a “blanket denial,” because the insured continued to provide the insurer with notice and the insured and insurer continued to negotiate over liability
Olin Corp. v. Certain Underwriters
468 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2006) Cited 58 timesHolding that it was not reversible error for the trial judge to choose not to selectively exclude portions of the experts testimony that the court thought were not well supported, but rather consider the testimony as a whole