§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC, Insurance Appeals. <br />--------------------------------<br /> Viking Pump, Inc. and Warren Pumps, LLC, Appellants, TIG Insurance Company, et al., Respondents.

Brief

23 Cited authorities

  1. Greenfield v. Philles Records

    98 N.Y.2d 562 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 1,914 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms"

  2. Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.

    74 N.Y.2d 487 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 1,379 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff could not recover attorneys' fees from the defendant without express language in the agreement permitting such a recovery

  3. Beal Sav. Bank v. Sommer

    8 N.Y.3d 318 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 547 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a contract should not be interpreted so as to render any portion of it meaningless

  4. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    98 N.Y.2d 208 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 436 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that indemnity should be allocated pro rata

  5. Universal Am. Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co.

    2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5516 (N.Y. 2015)   Cited 182 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the language of an insurance rider unambiguously applied to losses incurred from unauthorized access to plaintiff's computer system, where the "[t]he intentional word placement of 'fraudulent' before 'entry' and 'change' manifest[ed] the parties' [specific] intent."

  6. Brooke Group Ltd. v. JCH Syndicate 488

    87 N.Y.2d 530 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 272 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding forum selection clause permissive where it stated: "the underwriters will submit to the jurisdiction of a United States court"

  7. State v. Cont'l Ins. Co.

    55 Cal.4th 186 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 146 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Noting that courts must give meaning to the language of the insurance policy regarding appropriate allocation method

  8. Vigilant v. Stearns

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2080 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 143 times
    Finding plaintiff's failure to obtain defendant insurer's approval to settlement violated the terms of the insurance policy and precluded coverage

  9. E.R. Squibb Sons, Inc v. Lloyd's Companies

    241 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 169 times
    Holding that "settlement agreements are not contracts of insurance"

  10. Westview Associates v. Guaranty National Ins. Co.

    95 N.Y.2d 334 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that APE did not apply to claim related to child's ingestion of lead paint

  11. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation