§Why CasetextPricing

Opposition

Opposition

17 Cited authorities

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.

    2 Cal.4th 962 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 1,198 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Aubry, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 579 at pages 587 through 588, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 703, the court, citing language from Labor Council, held the Regents were not required to pay private contractors the prevailing wage under section 1770 et seq., which applies to public works, for the construction of student and staff housing.

  2. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.

    19 Cal.4th 26 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 773 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that title insurer owed no duty of ordinary care to non-clients, commenting that "[i]n the business arena it would be unprecedented to impose a duty on one actor to operate its business in a manner that would ensure the financial success of transactions between third parties"

  3. Shoemaker v. Myers

    52 Cal.3d 1 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 466 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no employee has a vested contractual right ... beyond the time or contrary to the terms and conditions fixed by law"

  4. City of Moorpark v. Superior Court

    18 Cal.4th 1143 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 303 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff may simultaneously pursue § 132a claim before Workers' Compensation Appeals Board and action in state court for common-law violation of public policy

  5. Gantt v. Sentry Insurance

    1 Cal.4th 1083 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 360 times
    Holding that a claim for retaliatory dismissal for supporting a coworker's claim of sexual harassment is not precluded by workers' compensation remedies

  6. Livitsanos v. Superior Court

    2 Cal.4th 744 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 193 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding IIED claim could be "outside the scope and normal risks of employment" where premised on defendants' false claims that plaintiff embezzled money

  7. Huffman v. Interstate Brands Corp.

    121 Cal.App.4th 679 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 113 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Huffman, an employee was unlawfully demoted to a new position involving physical labor, and suffered a knee injury working in the new position. Huffman, 121 Cal.App.4th at 689-90.

  8. Moncada v. W. Coast Quartz Corp.

    221 Cal.App.4th 768 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 83 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding allegation of a "false promise to pay a retirement bonus" did "not reach the level of extreme and outrageous conduct that is necessary" to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress

  9. Perez v. Golden Empire Transit District

    209 Cal.App.4th 1228 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 74 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the following allegation sufficiently pled CGA exhaustion: "[o]n January 15, 2010, Plaintiff filed a timely claim complying with the required claims statute."

  10. Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn.

    19 Cal.App.4th 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "fees are not authorized for exhibits not used at trial" under section 1033.5, subdivision