§Why CasetextPricing

Plaintiffs_opposition_to_motion_for_summary_judgment

Opposition

8 Cited authorities

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 4,894 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”

  2. Carma Developers, Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.

    2 Cal.4th 342 (Cal. 1992)   Cited 779 times
    Holding that a clause in a commercial lease allowing the lessor to terminate the lease and recapture the leasehold upon notice by the lessee of intent to sublet or assign had to be exercised in good faith

  3. FPI Development, Inc. v. Nakashima

    231 Cal.App.3d 367 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 288 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Affirming summary judgment

  4. Binder v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

    75 Cal.App.4th 832 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 219 times
    Holding that consent to a contract may be manifested by conduct

  5. Hicks v. E. T. Legg & Associates

    89 Cal.App.4th 496 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 48 times

    D034398 Filed May 25, 2001 Certified for Publication Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 712645, Patricia K. Cookson, Judge. Affirmed. George McGill for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Wingert, Grebing, Brubaker Ryan, Norman A. Ryan and Brian P. Worthington for Defendant and Respondent E. T. Legg Associates. The Buckley Firm and Jonathan C. Cavett; Luce, Forward, Hamilton Scripps, Charles A. Bird and Karen M. Clemes for Defendant and Respondent Executive Trustee Services

  6. Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Constr. Co.

    14 Cal.App.3d 887 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971)   Cited 80 times
    In Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Constr. Co. (1971) 14 Cal.App.3d 887 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 723], subcontractor Acoustics sued the general contractor (Steiny) and the surety (General) in a consolidated action, alleging causes of action for breach of contract by the general contractor and on the payment bond.

  7. Section 437c - Motion for summary judgment

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 437c   Cited 8,306 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Ruling on summary judgment motion must be based on "papers submitted" with the motion

  8. Section 437 - Grounds for motion to appear on face of challenged pleading; motion based on matter subject to judicial notice

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 437   Cited 289 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a) The grounds for a motion to strike shall appear on the face of the challenged pleading or from any matter of which the court is required to take judicial notice. (b) Where the motion to strike is based on matter of which the court may take judicial notice pursuant to Section 452 or 453 of the Evidence Code, such matter shall be specified in the notice of motion, or in the supporting points and authorities, except as the court may otherwise permit. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 437 Added by Stats. 1982