65 Cited authorities

  1. Hill v. Colorado

    530 U.S. 703 (2000)   Cited 1,279 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding content neutral a ban on "picketing," "demonstrating," "protest, education, or counseling" even though it may require the government "to review the content of the statements made"
  2. Smith v. Maryland

    442 U.S. 735 (1979)   Cited 2,145 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding that use of pen register was not a "search" for Fourth Amendment purposes
  3. Costco v. Superior Ct.

    47 Cal.4th 725 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 304 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the privilege "does not extend to subject matter otherwise unprivileged merely because that subject matter has been communicated to the attorney"
  4. In re Qawi

    32 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 255 times
    Noting that antipsychotics "have been the cause of considerable [reversible and potentially permanent] side effects. . . . On rare occasions use of these drugs has caused sudden death."
  5. People v. Collie

    30 Cal.3d 43 (Cal. 1981)   Cited 377 times
    In Collie, the prosecution, after learning in the course of cross-examination that a defense witness had spoken previously to a defense investigator, requested discovery of the notes prepared by the investigator.
  6. Pioneer Ele. v. Superior Court

    40 Cal.4th 360 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 145 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that there was no serious invasion of privacy where disclosure of the identity of potential class members did not involve revelation of personal or business secrets, intimate activities, or similar private information, and threatened no undue intrusion into their personal lives
  7. Doe v. United States Swimming

    200 Cal.App.4th 1424 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 125 times
    Holding the decision to impose a particular sanction is " ' "subject to reversal only for manifest abuse exceeding the bounds of reason" ' "
  8. Bockrath v. Aldrich Chemical Co.

    21 Cal.4th 71 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 167 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in cases that require resolving "complicated . . . medical causation issues, the standard of proof ordinarily required is a reasonable medical probability based upon competent expert testimony that the defendant's conduct contributed to the plaintiff's injury"
  9. Forthmann v. Boyer

    97 Cal.App.4th 977 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Forthmann v. Boyer (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 977, 985, the Court of Appeal implied contestation occurs when objections are filed and rejected a claim that discovery was proper without the filing of an objection.
  10. Ruiz v. Podolsky

    50 Cal.4th 838 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that specific provision in state's medical malpractice Act required arbitration of wrongful death claims where the decedent had agreed to arbitrate any claim arising from medical provider's services.
  11. Section 2030.220 - Answers

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.220   Cited 19 times
    Responding party who "does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully" to interrogatory may so state, but must "make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations," unless the information is "equally available to the propounding party"