§Why CasetextPricing

Motion_to_bifurcate

Motion

5 Cited authorities

  1. Foreman Clark Corp. v. Fallon

    3 Cal.3d 875 (Cal. 1971)   Cited 1,295 times
    Rejecting claim "evidence should not have been considered since the other leases predated the breach by almost two years[]" because "[t]his merely went to the weight which the trier of fact, in its discretion, gave to the evidence"

  2. Herrington v. Superior Court

    107 Cal.App.4th 1052 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 75 times
    In Orrick, the California Court of Appeal held the fees a client paid to his attorney could "constitute actual damages" to the extent the client was "claiming he paid more than the value of the legal services he received."

  3. Freiberg v. City of Mission Viejo

    33 Cal.App.4th 1484 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 22 times

    Docket No. G014118. April 10, 1995. Appeal from Superior Court of Orange County, No. 626176, Robert Gardner, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to California Constitution, article VI, section 21. COUNSEL Robins, Kaplan, Miller Ciresi, Hayward K. Colby, Joseph L. Dunn and Tanya Kittelson for Plaintiff and Appellant. Edwin J. Richards for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION WALLIN, J. Charles L. Freiberg attempts to appeal the judgment of nonsuit entered against him as to the City of Mission Viejo, contending

  4. Trickey v. Superior Court

    252 Cal.App.2d 650 (Cal. Ct. App. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    Docket No. 11573. July 17, 1967. PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Sacramento County to hear and pass on a motion for a bifurcated trial at which the issue of liability would be heard and decided before trial of the damage question in a personal injury action. Writ granted. Mento, Buchler Littlefield and Theodore H. Morrison for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Colley McGhee and Milton L. McGhee for Real Party in Interest. FRIEDMAN, J. This mandate proceeding is the

  5. Jud Whitehead Heater Co. v. Obler

    111 Cal.App.2d 861 (Cal. Ct. App. 1952)   Cited 16 times

    Docket No. 15030. June 23, 1952. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. O.D. Hamlin, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Actions for an accounting and to impress constructive trusts on property alleged to have been acquired with embezzled money. Judgment for plaintiffs affirmed. Francis T. Cornish, Cornish Cornish and Howard W. Wayne for Appellants. Charles M. Stark, Paul W. McComish and Fredrik S. Waiss for Respondents. BRAY, J. These two actions, which were consolidated for trial, sought