§Why CasetextPricing

Motion For Summary Judgment

Motion

4 Cited authorities

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 4,989 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”

  2. Barkley v. City of Blue Lake

    47 Cal.App.4th 309 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 22 times

    Docket No. A071174. July 10, 1996. Appeal from Superior Court of Humboldt County, No. 92DR0169, John E. Buffington, Judge. COUNSEL Richard S. Platz and C. Dan Lange for Defendant and Appellant. P. Timothy Murphy and Richard E. Rader for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION PARRILLI, J. In this case, we hold that an action on a judgment against a public entity is not subject to the claim filing requirements of Government Code sections 905 and 945.4. Further statutory references are to the Government

  3. Section 523 - Exceptions to discharge

    11 U.S.C. § 523   Cited 27,679 times   147 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over certain dischargeability disputes

  4. Rule 3.1350 - Motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication

    Cal. R. 3.1350   Cited 237 times

    (a) Definitions As used in this rule, (1) "Motion" refers to either a motion for summary judgment or a motion for summary adjudication. (2) "Material facts" are facts that relate to the cause of action, claim for damages, issue of duty, or affirmative defense that is the subject of the motion and that could make a difference in the disposition of the motion. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2016.) (b) Motion for summary adjudication If made in the alternative, a motion for summary adjudication