§Why CasetextPricing

Suhail Farran vs. Doordash Inc.

Motion for Leave to Amend

10 Cited authorities

  1. Thompson Pacific Construction, Inc. v. City of Sunnyvale

    155 Cal.App.4th 525 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 180 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the plaintiff waived its argument that the special verdict form was defective for failing to require a finding on the materiality element of a cause of action

  2. Consultants, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad

    190 Cal.App.4th 1332 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting questionable continued viability of Weeshoff, explaining "the party contracting with a public agency is charged with the knowledge of public contracting law"

  3. Atkinson v. Elk Corp.

    109 Cal.App.4th 739 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 104 times
    Finding shingles were not consumer goods within the version of the Act operative at that time

  4. Howard v. County of San Diego

    184 Cal.App.4th 1422 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 38 times
    Recognizing futility as an exception to ripeness

  5. Mabie v. Hyatt

    61 Cal.App.4th 581 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 51 times
    Holding "in California coupling a justified charge with an unjustified charge does not shield a party from a malicious prosecution claim on the unjustified charge."

  6. Kittredge Sports Co. v. Superior Court

    213 Cal.App.3d 1045 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 37 times
    In Kittredge Sports Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1045, 1048, the court concluded the amendment would not prejudice the defendant.

  7. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,110 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems

  8. Section 473 - Mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 473   Cited 5,974 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Allowing up to six months to challenge a judgment entered through the moving party's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect

  9. Section 576 - Amendment of pleading or pretrial conference order

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 576   Cited 124 times

    Any judge, at any time before or after commencement of trial, in the furtherance of justice, and upon such terms as may be proper, may allow the amendment of any pleading or pretrial conference order. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 576 Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 882.

  10. Section 1010.6 - Electronic service of document

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1010.6   Cited 41 times
    Authorizing trial courts to adopt local rules permitting electronic filing of documents