Califano v. Yamasaki
442 U.S. 682 (1979) Cited 2,022 times 12 Legal AnalysesHolding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"
Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.
512 U.S. 753 (1994) Cited 656 timesHolding that an injunction against anti-abortion protesters was not viewpoint discriminatory because "none of the restrictions imposed by the court were directed at the contents of petitioner's message."
IT Corp. v. County of Imperial
35 Cal.3d 63 (Cal. 1983) Cited 205 timesHolding that the presumption is rebuttable
14859 Moorpark Homeowner's Ass'n v. Vrt Corp.
63 Cal.App.4th 1396 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) Cited 105 timesReviewing court will presume the trial court made appropriate factual findings in the absence of express findings and review the record for substantial evidence to support the rulings
Prigmore v. City of Redding
211 Cal.App.4th 1322 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 34 timesIn Prigmore, the trial court incorrectly declined to consider Savage on the ground it involved a shopping mall and was decided before Fashion Valley Mall, supra, 42 Cal.4th 850, held shopping malls were public forums.
Abrams v. St. John's Hospital & Health Center
25 Cal.App.4th 628 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 35 timesStating that "when terminations of staff privileges are incidental to a hospital's reorganization of one of its departments . . . the terminations are the result of administrative/quasi-legislative decisions, rather than adjudicatory/quasi-judicial decisions about a doctor, and hence do not require a due process hearing"
City and County of San Francisco v. Daley
16 Cal.App.4th 734 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993) Cited 28 times 1 Legal AnalysesExplaining why stipulated judgment in public nuisance case was encompassed by Code Civ. Proc., § 564, subd. (b)
Feminist Women's Health Center v. Blythe
17 Cal.App.4th 1543 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993) Cited 6 timesIn Feminist Women's Health Center v. Blythe (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 1543 [ 22 Cal.Rptr.2d 184], we addressed defendants' challenges to the trial court's issuance of a permanent injunction imposing time, place and manner restrictions on the activities of antiabortion demonstrators at plaintiff's Sacramento clinic, and to the court's order awarding plaintiff attorney fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.
Sachs v. Killeen
165 Cal.App.2d 205 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958) Cited 12 timesDocket No. 23183. November 17, 1958. APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County appointing a receiver ex parte, confirming the appointment and continuing it pendente lite. Bayard Rhone, Judge. Order confirming appointment of receiver affirmed, appeal from ex parte order appointing receiver, dismissed. Arnerich, Del Valle Sinatra and Richard A. Perkins for Appellants. S.L. Kurland for Respondent. PATROSSO, J. pro tem.[fn*] [fn*] Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council. This is
Alhambra-Etc. Mines v. Alhambra G. Mine
116 Cal.App.2d 869 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953) Cited 17 timesIn Alhambra the plaintiff sought to "'shut down the operations of [a] mine and mill' and permit no person to trespass on the property."