7 Cited authorities

  1. White v. Ultramar, Inc.

    21 Cal.4th 563 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 474 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a single act of retaliatory termination demonstrated that a middle manager "determined corporate policy"
  2. Cruz v. Homebase

    83 Cal.App.4th 160 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 106 times
    Reversing punitive damages award because single store's security supervisor who supervised only a few employees was not a managing agent of corporation
  3. G.D. Searle Co. v. Superior Court

    49 Cal.App.3d 22 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 132 times
    In G.D. Searle Co. v. Superior Court (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 218], the Court of Appeal issued a peremptory writ directing the superior court to sustain a demurrer in part because of the conclusory allegations relating to punitive damages.
  4. Perkins v. Superior Court

    117 Cal.App.3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that pleading the language of section 3294 "is not objectionable when sufficient facts are alleged to support the allegation"
  5. Brousseau v. Jarrett

    73 Cal.App.3d 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that the "conclusory characterization of defendant's conduct as intentional, willful and fraudulent" was "patently insufficient" to support the recovery of punitive damages
  6. Cyrus v. Haveson

    65 Cal.App.3d 306 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 33 times
    Explaining a cause of action for conversion may support an award of exemplary and punitive damages if a defendant acts with oppression, fraud, or malice
  7. Section 3294 - When damages recoverable for sake of example and by way of punishment; employer liability for acts of employee; death from homicide

    Cal. Civ. Code § 3294   Cited 2,868 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Stating plaintiff may recover punitive damages "in addition to the actual damages"