§Why CasetextPricing

Darlene Marlowe vs. Genpact Mortgage Services, Inc.

Opposition

11 Cited authorities

  1. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.

    23 Cal.4th 163 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 563 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding restitution is "the return of the excess of what the plaintiff gave the defendant over the value of what the plaintiff received"

  2. Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A.

    50 Cal.4th 1389 (Cal. 2010)   Cited 160 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that penalties for violation of Labor Code § 203 are not recoverable under the UCL

  3. Feitelberg v. Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC

    134 Cal.App.4th 997 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 92 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that rule applies to class action plaintiffs

  4. Askew v. Askew

    22 Cal.App.4th 942 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 86 times
    Concluding that trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear husband's civil action where wife's dissolution action was filed first

  5. Hodge v. Superior Court

    145 Cal.App.4th 278 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 56 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Hodge v. Superior Court (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 278 (Hodge), for example, employees asserted a UCL cause of action premised on violations of the Labor Code regarding overtime wages.

  6. Safeway, Inc. v. Superior Court (Enrique Esparza)

    238 Cal.App.4th 1138 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 39 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, to demonstrate the propriety of class certification under California's Unfair Competition Law, plaintiffs had to show "deep, system-wide error" in Safeway's system for paying meal and rest break premiums

  7. Carpenson v. Najarian

    254 Cal.App.2d 856 (Cal. Ct. App. 1967)   Cited 8 times

    Docket No. 732. October 2, 1967. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Joseph L. Joy, Judge. Affirmed. Action for declaratory relief seeking to establish priority of a trust deed over liens created by certain loans made by defendants. Judgment for defendants affirmed. Perry, Price Carter and J.C. Price for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Max M. Hayden, Landels, Ripley, Gregory Diamond, Dubsick, Helon, Manfredo Forbes, Earl M. Ripley, Marvin E. Helon, Wallace G. Quinlisk, Leo S

  8. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  9. Section 1011 - Manner of service

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1011   Cited 80 times
    Authorizing personal service on an attorney

  10. Section 1013 - Requirements for service by mail

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1013   Cited 74 times

    (a) In case of service by mail, the notice or other paper shall be deposited in a post office, mailbox, subpost office, substation, or mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, with postage paid, addressed to the person on whom it is to be served, at the office address as last given by that person on any document filed in the cause and served on the party making service by mail; otherwise at that party's place of residence.

  11. Section 1010.6 - Electronic service of document

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1010.6   Cited 39 times
    Authorizing trial courts to adopt local rules permitting electronic filing of documents