§Why CasetextPricing

Juan Manuel Murillo Guerrero vs. Walsworth Property Management, Inc.

Opposition

18 Cited authorities

  1. Flatley v. Mauro

    39 Cal.4th 299 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 1,349 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that anti-SLAPP protection is not available where the "assertedly protected speech or petition activity [is] illegal as a matter of law"

  2. People v. Tufunga

    21 Cal.4th 935 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 361 times
    Holding that claim of right defense does not extend to robberies perpetrated to satisfy, settle or otherwise collect on a debt

  3. Goodman v. Kennedy

    18 Cal.3d 335 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 616 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant attorney owed no duty to third parties who relied on faulty advice the attorney gave his clients "in the absence of any showing that the legal advice was foreseeably transmitted to or relied upon by plaintiffs or that plaintiffs were intended beneficiaries of a transaction to which the advice pertained"

  4. Philippine Export Foreign Loan v. Chuidian

    218 Cal.App.3d 1058 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 125 times
    Declining to exercise extraterritorial personal jurisdiction because, under California law, "the limits which generally exist upon the right to execute ... apply in a judgment debtor proceeding such as this" (citing Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 708.510 cmt. (West 1987) (Legislative Committee Comments, Assembly, 1982 Addition))

  5. Roman v. County of Los Angeles

    85 Cal.App.4th 316 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 82 times
    Finding that exhaustion of State administrative remedies does not fulfill exhaustion requirement for federal claim

  6. Cooper v. Leslie Salt Co.

    70 Cal.2d 627 (Cal. 1969)   Cited 142 times
    Affirming denial of leave to amend where plaintiff "insinuates multiple wrongs by respondents, [but] he never points out in what manner those insinuations could be combined to state a cause of action"

  7. People v. Kozlowski

    96 Cal.App.4th 853 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 50 times
    Holding that PIN numbers meet the Penal Code's definition of "property" since that definition "includes personal property such as money, goods, chattels, things in action and evidences of debt"

  8. Platt v. Coldwell Banker Res. Real Estate Serv

    217 Cal.App.3d 1439 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 50 times

    Docket No. D009465. February 15, 1990. [Opinion certified for partial publication. ] Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976.1 and 976(b), this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part II B. Appeal from Superior Court of San Diego County, No. 589723, Jack R. Levitt, Judge. COUNSEL Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois Bisgaard, Patricia Mundy, Janice Gay Gibbons and Manuel R. Ramos for Cross-complainants and Appellants. Lindley, Lazar Scales, Robert M. McLeod and Ron A. Stormoen

  9. People v. Hesslink

    167 Cal.App.3d 781 (Cal. Ct. App. 1985)   Cited 44 times
    Rejecting defense argument that there was insufficient evidence of extortion because he had not make “a request or demand for a specific sum”

  10. SKF Farms v. Superior Court

    153 Cal.App.3d 902 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 35 times

    Docket Nos. 31427, 31428. March 15, 1984. COUNSEL Sutherland Gerber, Ravinder Samra, Ronis, Ronis Ronis and John George Ronis for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Hart Michaelis, James I. Michaelis, Engstrom, Lipscomb Lack and Douglas S. Knoll for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION BUTLER, J. Petitioners SKF Farms and Jerry Gonzales, Sr., Jerry Gonzales, Jr., and Victor J. Gonzales (collectively called petitioners) seek writs of mandate after the superior court sustained without leave to