§Why CasetextPricing

Kim Choy vs. Ali Pakzad

Demurrer to Complaint

8 Cited authorities

  1. Blank v. Kirwan

    39 Cal.3d 311 (Cal. 1985)   Cited 3,071 times
    Holding that the standard for a failure to state a claim is whether "the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action"

  2. Allen v. City of Sacramento

    234 Cal.App.4th 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 408 times
    Holding allegation of "a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, does not" state a claim for violation of the Bane Act

  3. Cochran v. Cochran

    65 Cal.App.4th 488 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 262 times
    Holding that a defendant's conduct is "extreme or outrageous" when a reasonable person would exclaim "outrageous!" upon hearing of the defendant's actions

  4. Ivanoff v. Bank of Am., N.A.

    9 Cal.App.5th 719 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 132 times
    Holding fraud claims "governed by" three-year statute of limitations

  5. Wilner v. Sunset Life Insurance Company

    78 Cal.App.4th 952 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 80 times
    Noting that the unfairness prong of the UCA must measure the "gravity of the harm" to the victim

  6. City of South Pasadena v. Department of Transportation

    29 Cal.App.4th 1280 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 62 times
    In South Pasadena, the Third Appellate District held the abuse of discretion standard to be generally inappropriate in summary judgment proceedings: "'The only exception to the independent review standard applies when we review a trial court's exercise of discretion as allowed by Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (e).

  7. Salazar v. Matejcek

    245 Cal.App.4th 634 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    A144106 03-10-2016 Ernesto A. SALAZAR, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Ross MATEJCEK, Defendant and Appellant. Carter, Momsen & Knight, PC, Brian S. Momsen, Alexander C. Rich, Ukiah, Counsel for Plaintiffs and Appellants Ernesto A. Salazar, Jr., et al. Brigham Law Office, Thomas S. Brigham, Brooke A. Brigham, Ukiah, Counsel for Defendant and Appellant Ross Matejcek. DONDERO, J. Carter, Momsen & Knight, PC, Brian S. Momsen, Alexander C. Rich, Ukiah, Counsel for Plaintiffs and Appellants

  8. McRae v. Blakeley

    3 Cal.App. 171 (Cal. Ct. App. 1906)   Cited 4 times

    Civ. No. 165. February 24, 1906. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. M. L. Short, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles J. Lamberson, and H. P. Brown, for Appellant. Hannah Miller, for Respondent. BUCKLES, J. — This action was brought to recover damages against the defendants for constructing a ditch across certain lands belonging to plaintiff and to secure a perpetual injunction restraining defendant from maintaining, using, enlarging, or turning