§Why CasetextPricing

Motion For Leave To Amend

Motion

13 Cited authorities

  1. Thompson Pacific Construction, Inc. v. City of Sunnyvale

    155 Cal.App.4th 525 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 180 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the plaintiff waived its argument that the special verdict form was defective for failing to require a finding on the materiality element of a cause of action

  2. Consultants, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad

    190 Cal.App.4th 1332 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 103 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting questionable continued viability of Weeshoff, explaining "the party contracting with a public agency is charged with the knowledge of public contracting law"

  3. Atkinson v. Elk Corp.

    109 Cal.App.4th 739 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 104 times
    Finding shingles were not consumer goods within the version of the Act operative at that time

  4. Howard v. County of San Diego

    184 Cal.App.4th 1422 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 38 times
    Recognizing futility as an exception to ripeness

  5. Mabie v. Hyatt

    61 Cal.App.4th 581 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 51 times
    Holding "in California coupling a justified charge with an unjustified charge does not shield a party from a malicious prosecution claim on the unjustified charge."

  6. Kittredge Sports Co. v. Superior Court

    213 Cal.App.3d 1045 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 37 times
    In Kittredge Sports Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 213 Cal.App.3d 1045, 1048, the court concluded the amendment would not prejudice the defendant.

  7. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,110 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems

  8. Section 473 - Mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 473   Cited 5,974 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Allowing up to six months to challenge a judgment entered through the moving party's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect

  9. Section 576 - Amendment of pleading or pretrial conference order

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 576   Cited 124 times

    Any judge, at any time before or after commencement of trial, in the furtherance of justice, and upon such terms as may be proper, may allow the amendment of any pleading or pretrial conference order. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 576 Added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 882.

  10. Section 1011 - Manner of service

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1011   Cited 80 times
    Authorizing personal service on an attorney

  11. Section 1013 - Requirements for service by mail

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1013   Cited 78 times

    (a) In case of service by mail, the notice or other paper shall be deposited in a post office, mailbox, subpost office, substation, or mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, with postage paid, addressed to the person on whom it is to be served, at the office address as last given by that person on any document filed in the cause and served on the party making service by mail; otherwise at that party's place of residence.

  12. Section 1010.6 - Electronic service of document

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1010.6   Cited 41 times
    Authorizing trial courts to adopt local rules permitting electronic filing of documents

  13. Section 2-30.001 - Written Statement Explaining Consumer Rights Under Chapter 681, Florida Statutes; Hearings Before Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board

    Fla. Admin. Code R. 2-30.001   Cited 58 times

    (1) The following documents are incorporated into these rules by reference and can each be obtained by visiting the applicable web address shown below, where available, or by contacting the address shown in subsection (4): (a) The form entitled "Manufacturer's Answer, " DLA/LL-006 (rev. 2/06), effective 2-1-06. (b) The forms entitled "Consumer's Prehearing Information Sheet DLA/LL-007, (rev. 02/2023), effective 2-1-2023, available at http://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-14995 and Manufacturer's