Docket No. B112571. January 21, 1998. Appeal from Superior Court of Ventura County, No. CIV167506, William L. Peck, Judge. COUNSEL Karen M. Andrews for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Philip A. Metson for Real Party in Interest. OPINION GILBERT, Acting P.J. A subcontractor and a prime contractor on a public works project have a dispute. Their agreement provides that disputes be resolved by way of arbitration. Here we hold that the subcontractor's suit against the prime contractor's surety
Docket No. 17977. November 18, 1977. COUNSEL Mitchell, Silberberg Knupp, Howard S. Smith and David S. Gubman for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Howard G. Sonksen and Fred S. Pardes for Real Party in Interest. OPINION KAUFMAN, J. The petitioners filed a motion to stay proceedings pending the outcome of an arbitration proceeding which was ordered pursuant to a motion to compel arbitration. The motion to stay proceedings was denied. Petitioners seek a writ of mandate. We have concluded that
A petition to compel arbitration or to stay proceedings pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1281.2 and 1281.4 must state, in addition to other required allegations, the provisions of the written agreement and the paragraph that provides for arbitration. The provisions must be stated verbatim or a copy must be physically or electronically attached to the petition and incorporated by reference. Cal. R. Ct. 3.1330 Rule 3.1330 amended effective 1/1/2016; adopted as rule 371 effective 1/1/1984;