§Why CasetextPricing

David J. Burchell vs. Arash Aminian

Demurrer to Complaint

17 Cited authorities

  1. Lazar v. Superior Court

    12 Cal.4th 631 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 1,695 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that justifiable reliance is a required element of a fraud claim

  2. Cochran v. Cochran

    65 Cal.App.4th 488 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 264 times
    Holding that a defendant's conduct is "extreme or outrageous" when a reasonable person would exclaim "outrageous!" upon hearing of the defendant's actions

  3. Fermino v. Fedco, Inc.

    7 Cal.4th 701 (Cal. 1994)   Cited 264 times
    Holding that a claim of false imprisonment by an employer is always outside the scope of the compensation bargain

  4. Piedra v. Dugan

    123 Cal.App.4th 1483 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 178 times
    Holding that order granting in limine motion was harmless error because the evidence was directed to an issue the jury never reached

  5. Berger v. California Ins. Guarantee Assn.

    128 Cal.App.4th 989 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 173 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. B174412 April 27, 2005 Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC265484, Charles W. McCoy, Jr., Judge. Law Offices of Steven L. Zelig and Steven L. Zelig for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Black, Compean Hall, Frederick G. Hall and Jacqueline L. Shulman for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION PERLUSS, P.J. This case involves the interplay between Code of Civil Procedure section 340.9 (section 340.9), which revives certain time-barred claims against insurers for policy benefits for

  6. Falahati v. Kondo

    127 Cal.App.4th 823 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 172 times
    Holding plaintiff "plainly fail[ed] to state a cause of action" against defendant who was "nowhere mentioned in the body of the complaint"

  7. Fox v. Pollack

    181 Cal.App.3d 954 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 270 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Identifying elements of negligent misrepresentation

  8. Hauter v. Zogarts

    14 Cal.3d 104 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 320 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff stated a claim pursuant to Rest.2d Torts, § 402B, recognized under California law

  9. Stansfield v. Starkey

    220 Cal.App.3d 59 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 134 times
    Affirming dismissal of fraud claim where it "was not clearly alleged that each representation was false when made"

  10. Gami v. Mullikin Medical Center

    18 Cal.App.4th 870 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 69 times
    Setting out elements of medical malpractice claim under California law