Mintz v. Blue Cross of California
172 Cal.App.4th 1594 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 134 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "corporate agents and employees acting for and on behalf of a corporation cannot be held liable for inducing a breach of the corporation's contract"
Popescu v. Apple Inc.
1 Cal.App.5th 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016) Cited 44 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Popescu v. Apple Inc., 1 Cal. App. 5th 39, 62 (Ct. App. 2016), the court declined to extend Reeves to the facts of that case, but did not hold more generally that Reeves could never apply outside the employment context.
Kasparian v. County of Los Angeles
38 Cal.App.4th 242 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995) Cited 68 timesHolding that a party to a prospective contract may not be liable for IIEPA
Rader Co. v. Stone
178 Cal.App.3d 10 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986) Cited 52 timesNoting that at pleading stage plaintiff may plead inconsistent and alternative counts
Beatty v. Pacific States S. L. Co.
4 Cal.App.2d 692 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935) Cited 35 timesIn Beatty, the court recognized the rule permitting the pleading of inconsistent causes of action; it determined, however, that such rule was never "intended to sanction the statement in a verified complaint of certain facts as constituting a transaction in one count or cause of action, and in another count or cause of action a statement of contradictory or antagonistic facts as constituting the same transaction."
Section 25-A-2 - Persons subject to tax
N.Y. Gen. City Law § 25-A-2 Cited 8 times(a) Imposition of tax.-A tax determined in accordance with the rates set forth in this local law is hereby imposed for each taxable year, ending on or after July first, nineteen hundred sixty-six, but commencing prior to January first, nineteen hundred seventy-six, on the city taxable income of every resident individual, resident estate and trust. (b) Partners and partnerships.- A partnership as such shall not be subject to tax under this local law. Persons carrying on business as partners shall