§Why CasetextPricing

Talya Nevo-Hacohen vs. Adam Horowitz

Motion to Strike or Tax Costs

16 Cited authorities

  1. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.

    178 Cal.App.4th 44 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 324 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that meals are not recoverable under Cal. Civ. P.Code § 1033.5.

  2. Nelson v. Anderson

    72 Cal.App.4th 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 282 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obligations violated by limiting plaintiff's role were owed to the corporation because the decisions "amount[ed] to alleged misfeasance or negligence in managing the corporation's business, causing the business to be a total failure"

  3. Rose v. Superior Court

    19 Cal.3d 899 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 273 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that nonparties were subject to an injunction as agents of the named defendants

  4. Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn.

    19 Cal.App.4th 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "fees are not authorized for exhibits not used at trial" under section 1033.5, subdivision

  5. Melnyk v. Robledo

    64 Cal.App.3d 618 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 155 times
    Noting that "the trial court . . . is not bound by the itemization claimed in the attorney's affidavit"

  6. El Dorado Meat Co. v. Yosemite Meat and Locker Service, Inc.

    150 Cal.App.4th 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 55 times
    Affirming trial court's allowance of costs incurred in creating an exhibit summarizing important financial data, and observing that "[t]he idea that the cost is not allowable because the exhibit could have been created using adding machines, ledger paper, and pencils instead of an electronic database is antiquated"

  7. Acosta v. SI Corp.

    129 Cal.App.4th 1370 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 55 times
    In Acosta, a group of homeowners jointly sued SI Corporation on a single theory—product liability for an allegedly faulty mesh used in the construction of their homes—and lost.

  8. Ripley v. Pappadopoulos

    23 Cal.App.4th 1616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 63 times
    Holding that Federal Express charges are expressly disallowed—presumably because they constitute "postage"

  9. Foothill-De Anza Community College Dist. v. Emerich

    158 Cal.App.4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Restricting the vote on a community college bond measure to residents had a rational basis; there was a probability that "local residents had a greater knowledge and interest in local affairs, while nonresident property owners would mainly be interested in lower taxes"

  10. Science Applications Internat. v. Superior Court

    39 Cal.App.4th 1095 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 55 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming costs for graphic exhibit boards and video presented to the jury, as essentially "a computerized form of blowup or model which was apparently, in the opinion of the trial court, reasonably helpful to the trier of fact and possibly fitting within the category of ‘models and blowups’ " under the statute

  11. Rule 2.956 - Court reporting services in civil cases

    Cal. R. 2.956   Cited 33 times

    (a) Statutory reference; application This rule implements and must be applied so as to give effect to Government Code sections 68086(a) -(c). (b) Notice of availability; parties' request (1)Local policy to be adopted and posted Each trial court must adopt and post in the clerk's office a local policy enumerating the departments in which the services of official court reporters are normally available, and the departments in which the services of official court reporters are not normally available