§Why CasetextPricing

Lily Medina vs. Irma L Gutierrez

Motion to Strike

6 Cited authorities

  1. Emerald Bay Community Assn. v. Golden Eagle Ins. Corp.

    130 Cal.App.4th 1078 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 139 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding insured did not have contract damages because 100% of defense costs paid by two insurers; also stating that "[t]he general measure of damages for a breach of the duty to defend an insured, even if it is ultimately determined there is no coverage under the policy, are the costs and attorney fees expended by the insured defending the underlying action."

  2. Del Junco v. Hufnagel

    150 Cal.App.4th 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 51 times
    Holding that accusations about "a physician of being untrained and lacking the proper credentials are" "statements of fact."

  3. Stafford v. Ballinger

    199 Cal.App.2d 289 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)   Cited 49 times
    Stating "the holder of equitable title cannot maintain a quiet title action against the legal owner."

  4. Tostevin v. Douglas

    160 Cal.App.2d 321 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)   Cited 36 times
    In Tostevin, the plaintiff filed an action for declaratory relief and accounting, alleging that he had entered into an oral agreement with the defendants to work on a travel television show for a salary of $50 a week that the defendants had repudiated and refused to abide by. (Id. at p. 324.)

  5. Kronsberg v. Milton J. Wershow Co.

    238 Cal.App.2d 170 (Cal. Ct. App. 1965)   Cited 7 times

    Docket No. 28352. November 17, 1965. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leon T. David, Judge. Affirmed. Action for breach of contract, conversion and fraud. Judgment of dismissal after fourth amended complaint was ordered stricken and plaintiffs were given leave to amend but did not do so affirmed. Sax Grossman and Robert J. Grossman for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro Quittner, Frank C. Christl and G. Merle Bergman for Defendant and Respondent

  6. Lincoln Holding Corp. v. Union Indemnity Co.

    129 Cal.App. 399 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)   Cited 6 times

    Docket No. 4720. February 1, 1933. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying relief under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure. J. Walter Hanby, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. Feldman for Appellant. Janeway, Beach Hankey and Kidd, Schell Delamer for Respondent. PULLEN, P.J. This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment on the pleadings and also from an order striking from the files the second amended