§Why CasetextPricing

Ali Djowharzadeh vs. Bank of New York Mellon

Motion to Consolidate Cases

15 Cited authorities

  1. Lindsey v. Normet

    405 U.S. 56 (1972)   Cited 786 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing

  2. Dimock v. Emerald Properties

    81 Cal.App.4th 868 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 191 times
    Holding that plaintiff "was not required to tender any of the amounts due under the note" because he "could rely on the face of the record to show that the Commonwealth deed was void"

  3. Malkoskie v. Option One Mtg. Corp.

    188 Cal.App.4th 968 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 86 times
    Holding that comprehensive unlawful detainer judgment had preclusive effect on further challenges to validity of foreclosure

  4. Vella v. Hudgins

    20 Cal.3d 251 (Cal. 1977)   Cited 210 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the burden of proving the elements of res judicata is on the party asserting it

  5. Martin-Bragg v. Moore

    219 Cal.App.4th 367 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that trial court has the power to stay unlawful detainer proceeding or consolidate it with a pending action in which title is at issue "because a successful claim of title by the tenant would defeat the landlord's right to possession"

  6. Jessen v. Keystone Savings & Loan Assn.

    142 Cal.App.3d 454 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 35 times
    Recognizing the power to enjoin a non-judicial foreclosure sale where the amount of the debt was in dispute, but affirming the lower court's refusal to restrain the sale in question

  7. Old National Financial Services, Inc. v. Seibert

    194 Cal.App.3d 460 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 22 times
    In Old National Financial Services, Inc. v. Seibert (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 460, 239 Cal.Rptr. 728, a tenant appealed from an unlawful detainer judgment in favor of the landlord but did not obtain stay of judgment pending appeal.

  8. Wilson v. Gentile

    8 Cal.App.4th 759 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Docket No. B057235. August 4, 1992. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. LASC WEC 128945, James F. Nelson, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to California Constitution, article VI, section 21. COUNSEL Richard H. Benes for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Rosenfeld, Meyer Susman, Kirk M. Hallam and David F. Graber for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent. OPINION JOHNSON, J. In this case we are asked to interpret a clause requiring an option to be exercised "within thirty

  9. Mehr v. Superior Court

    139 Cal.App.3d 1044 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 17 times
    In Mehr v. Superior Court, supra, 139 Cal.App.3d 1044, after being sued for unlawful detainer the defendants filed an answer claiming that the plaintiff's trustee's deed had been obtained by fraud, and filed a separate action based on that claim.

  10. Greenhut v. Wooden

    129 Cal.App.3d 64 (Cal. Ct. App. 1982)   Cited 1 times

    Docket No. 62980. February 24, 1982. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. SWC 54916, Norman L. Epstein, Judge. COUNSEL Dudley Gray for Defendants and Appellants. Cadoo, Tretheway, McGinn Morgan, Robert J. Reamer and Jack W. Morgan for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION HASTINGS, J. This is an appeal by lessees Lowell A. Wooden and Dorothy M. Wooden, appellants, from a judgment in favor of lessor J.W. Greenhut, respondent, in an unlawful detainer action. Because of the complex nature

  11. Section 1048 - Joint hearing ordered; separate trial ordered

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1048   Cited 262 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating only "a common question of law or fact" is needed to support consolidation

  12. Section 2934a - Substitution of trustee under trust deed

    Cal. Civ. Code § 2934a   Cited 235 times
    Stating that the trustee "may be substituted by the recording in the county in which the property is located of a substitution executed and acknowledged by . . . all of the beneficiaries under the trust deed"

  13. Section 404.1 - When coordination appropriate

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 404.1   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the role of such a judge

  14. Rule 3.300 - Related Cases

    Cal. R. 3.300   Cited 58 times

    (a) Definition of "related case" A pending civil case is related to another pending civil case, or to a civil case that was dismissed with or without prejudice, or to a civil case that was disposed of by judgment, if the cases: (1) Involve the same parties and are based on the same or similar claims; (2) Arise from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact; (3) Involve claims against