§Why CasetextPricing

Efigenia Lagunas vs. Sps Technologies, LLC

Opposition

5 Cited authorities

  1. Amendments to Rules

    39 F.R.D. 69 (J.P.M.L. 1966)   Cited 438 times
    Stating mass accidents resulting in injuries to numerous people are generally inappropriate subjects of class actions

  2. In re Painewebber Ltd. Partner. Litigation

    147 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that the district court "reached the right conclusion when it declined to grant plaintiff an enlargement of the deadline date to opt out" and did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiff's "motion to exclude himself from the Class nearly a year after the deadline to do so had expired"

  3. Boise Cascade Home & Land Corp.

    71 F.R.D. 62 (N.D. Cal. 1976)   Cited 41 times
    Holding filing of separate suit during opt-out period "constituted an effective expression of a class member's desire to opt out"

  4. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  5. Rule 3.1202 - Contents of application

    Cal. R. 3.1202   Cited 51 times

    (a) Identification of attorney or party An ex parte application must state the name, address, and telephone number of any attorney known to the applicant to be an attorney for any party or, if no such attorney is known, the name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the party if known to the applicant. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2016.) (b) Disclosure of previous applications If an ex parte application has been refused in whole or in part, any subsequent application of the