8 Cited authorities

Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court
56 Cal.2d 355 (Cal. 1961) Cited 291 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.
Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert, LLC v. Century Theatres, Inc.
198 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 30 times
Noting federal law's antitrust injury requirement applies to claims under the Cartwright Act
Colonial Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Superior Court
31 Cal.3d 785 (Cal. 1982) Cited 60 times 2 Legal Analyses
Ruling that based on California's version of Rule 26(b), encompassing an identical minimal relevance standard, "Colonial's suggestion that the discovery of other insureds whose claims were negotiated by Sharkey will not yield relevant, admissible evidence, is patently meritless"
Emerson Elec. Co. v. Superior Court
16 Cal.4th 1101 (Cal. 1997) Cited 32 times 3 Legal Analyses
Docket No. S057119. December 1, 1997. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. MC006881, Ross Amspoker, Temporary Judge. Pursuant to California Constitution, article VI, section 21. COUNSEL Hennelly Grossfeld, John J. Hennelly and Susan J. Williams for Petitioners. Hugh F. Young, Jr., Jan S. Amundson, Harvey M. Grossman, Sherman Joyce, Crowell Moring, Victor E. Schwartz, Mark A. Behrens, Nabil W. Istafanous, D. Dudley Oldham, Pepper, Hamilton Scheetz, Alfred W. Cortese, Jr., Kathleen
Korea Data Systems Co. v. Superior Court
51 Cal.App.4th 1513 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997) Cited 17 times
In Korea Data, supra, 51 Cal.App.4th 1513, the defendant served the plaintiff with a request for production of documents.
Best Prods., Inc. v. Superior Court
119 Cal.App.4th 1181 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) Cited 9 times
Defining privilege log
Burke v. Superior Court
71 Cal.2d 276 (Cal. 1969) Cited 54 times
In Burke the defendant in an action on an attachment bond defended against a claim for the expenses incurred in winning the underlying action, by claiming, through denials, that the attachment could have been dissolved without winning the case on its merits.
Singer v. Superior Court
54 Cal.2d 318 (Cal. 1960) Cited 44 times
In Singer v. Superior Court, 54 Cal.2d 318 [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 697, 353 P.2d 305], cited by the Court of Appeal, it was held that answers to such questions should be required when propounded by written interrogatories; but such a situation is clearly different from that presented on the oral deposition of a layman.

William Hardy vs. Winifred Wilson

8 Cited authorities

In Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.

Noting federal law's antitrust injury requirement applies to claims under the Cartwright Act

Ruling that based on California's version of Rule 26(b), encompassing an identical minimal relevance standard, "Colonial's suggestion that the discovery of other insureds whose claims were negotiated by Sharkey will not yield relevant, admissible evidence, is patently meritless"

In Korea Data, supra, 51 Cal.App.4th 1513, the defendant served the plaintiff with a request for production of documents.

Defining privilege log

In Burke the defendant in an action on an attachment bond defended against a claim for the expenses incurred in winning the underlying action, by claiming, through denials, that the attachment could have been dissolved without winning the case on its merits.