D065843 08-03-2015 Karen D. NOSAL–TABOR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SHARP CHULA VISTA MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant and Respondent. David A. Miller for Plaintiff and Appellant. Andrews Lagasse Branch & Bell, Margaret Chandler Bell and Shauna L. Sinnott, San Diego, for Defendant and Respondent. AARON, J. David A. Miller for Plaintiff and Appellant. Andrews Lagasse Branch & Bell, Margaret Chandler Bell and Shauna L. Sinnott, San Diego, for Defendant and Respondent. AARON, J.I. INTRODUCTION The Nursing
Submitted: November 15, 2006 . This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3) Craig A. Miller, Levine, Steinberg & Miller, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Charles A. Bird, Esq., Kathryn A. Bernert, Esq., Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of
(a)Authorization for electronic service When a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or fax transmission, the document may be served electronically under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, Penal Code section 690.5, and the rules in this chapter. For purposes of electronic service made pursuant to Penal Code section 690.5, express consent to electronic service is required.[]= (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2022; previously amended effective January 1, 2007