§Why CasetextPricing

Smalley vs. Subaru of America, Inc.

Opposition

8 Cited authorities

  1. Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.

    174 Cal.App.4th 967 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 220 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing judgment on the cause of action found in defendant's favor and remanding so that trial court may enter default for that claim, and affirming judgment on remaining claims found in plaintiff's favor

  2. Oregel v. American Isuzu Motors, Inc.

    90 Cal.App.4th 1094 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 165 times
    Holding a plaintiff did not have to prove what caused a vehicle's oil leak which breached the Song–Beverly Act's warranty of merchantability

  3. Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.

    23 Cal.App.4th 174 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 107 times
    In Kwan, the statutory obligation the plaintiff claimed the defendant willfully violated was to replace the vehicle or refund the purchase price under California Civil Code § 1793.2(d)(2).

  4. Donlen v. Ford Motor Co.

    217 Cal.App.4th 138 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 53 times
    Finding such information probative

  5. Catalina Island Yacht Club v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.

    242 Cal.App.4th 1116 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 22 times   2 Legal Analyses

    G052062 12-04-2015 CATALINA ISLAND YACHT CLUB et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Orange County, Respondent; Timothy Beatty et al., Real Parties in Interest. Schumann Rosenberg, Kim Schumann, Jeffrey P. Cunningham and Marlys K. Braun for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Fox Johns Lazar Pekin & Wexler and George C. Lazar for Real Parties in Interest. ARONSON, J. Schumann Rosenberg, Kim Schumann, Jeffrey P. Cunningham and Marlys K. Braun for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent

  6. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Superior Court

    59 Cal.App.4th 263 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that failure to object on the basis of privilege in initial responses waives that privilege

  7. Section 2017.010 - Generally

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2017.010   Cited 140 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Allowing discovery of relevant non-privileged material

  8. Section 2031.210 - Requirements of response

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.210   Cited 16 times

    (a) The party to whom a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling has been directed shall respond separately to each item or category of item by any of the following: (1) A statement that the party will comply with the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling by the date set for the inspection, copying, testing, or sampling pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 2031.030 and any related activities. (2) A representation that the party lacks the ability