§Why CasetextPricing

Jennifer Avalos vs. Wsp Group Corporation

Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories

9 Cited authorities

  1. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pac. Healthcare Consultants

    148 Cal.App.4th 390 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 75 times
    Addressing the filing of untimely interrogatory responses with a motion to compel pending

  2. Leach v. Superior Court

    111 Cal.App.3d 902 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 11 times

    Docket No. 19929. November 7, 1980. COUNSEL Harrison Smith, D.D. Hughmanick, James L. Stoelker, John R. Mullen and Daniel McLoughlin for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Lee A. Lopez for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION PUGLIA, P.J. Petitioners are defendants in a quiet title action pending in the respondent superior court. By this application for a writ of mandate, they seek review of the trial court's order denying their motion to compel responses to interrogatories and for sanctions

  3. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,013 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  4. Section 2023.030 - Sanctions for misuse of discovery process

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030   Cited 506 times
    Providing for sanctions "[t]o the extent authorized by the chapter governing any particular discovery method"

  5. Section 2023.010 - Misuses of discovery process

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.010   Cited 363 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining unsuccessful and unjustified opposition to a motion to compel as a misuse of the discovery process

  6. Section 2030.290 - Failure to serve timely response; motion for order compelling response

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290   Cited 80 times
    Mandating sanctions "against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust"

  7. Section 1013 - Requirements for service by mail

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1013   Cited 78 times

    (a) In case of service by mail, the notice or other paper shall be deposited in a post office, mailbox, subpost office, substation, or mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, with postage paid, addressed to the person on whom it is to be served, at the office address as last given by that person on any document filed in the cause and served on the party making service by mail; otherwise at that party's place of residence.

  8. Section 1010.6 - Electronic service of document

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1010.6   Cited 40 times
    Authorizing trial courts to adopt local rules permitting electronic filing of documents

  9. Section 2030.260 - Time for service of original response on propounding party; time from date of service to respond; service of copy of responses on other parties

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.260   Cited 11 times

    (a) Within 30 days after service of interrogatories, the party to whom the interrogatories are propounded shall serve the original of the response to them on the propounding party, unless on motion of the propounding party the court has shortened the time for response, or unless on motion of the responding party the court has extended the time for response. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), in an unlawful detainer action or other proceeding under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1159) of Title