§Why CasetextPricing

Patrick Lent vs. West Coast Arborists, Inc.

Reply to Motion

18 Cited authorities

  1. Williams v. Superior Court

    3 Cal.5th 531 (Cal. 2017)   Cited 231 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Concluding fear of retaliation cuts in favor of "facilitating collective actions so that individual employees need not run the risk of individual suits"

  2. John B. v. Superior Court

    38 Cal.4th 1177 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 153 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the California Constitution's recognition of the inalienable right to privacy extends to medical records, subject to certain limitations

  3. In re Lifschutz

    2 Cal.3d 415 (Cal. 1970)   Cited 212 times
    Recognizing greater degree of confidentiality legally provided for psychotherapy than for other medical treatment

  4. Britt v. Superior Court

    20 Cal.3d 844 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 167 times
    Holding that patient "may not withhold information which relates to any physical or mental condition which they have put in issue"

  5. Fritsch v. City of Chula Vista

    187 F.R.D. 614 (S.D. Cal. 1999)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that party did not waive the privilege by putting emotional state at issue.

  6. Palay v. Superior Court

    18 Cal.App.4th 919 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 34 times
    Approving as a "narrowly tailored discovery procedure" the trial court's in camera review of the documents at issue

  7. Tate v. Superior Court

    45 Cal.App.3d 925 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 62 times
    Holding plaintiff waived claim he was not given 45 days' notice of sua sponte motion for discretionary dismissal

  8. Davis v. Superior Court

    7 Cal.App.4th 1008 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 32 times
    In Davis, the court recognized that by "limiting [plaintiff's] claim for emotional distress to pain and suffering associated with stated physical injuries, and by explaining that [the medical provider in question] provided no treatment in connection with the injuries for which compensation was sought, petitioner established that it is not reasonably probable that the records are directly relevant to the condition she placed in issue."

  9. Jones v. Superior Court

    119 Cal.App.3d 534 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981)   Cited 42 times
    In Jones, the plaintiff claimed an injury allegedly resulting from her mother's ingesting the drug DES while the plaintiff was in utero.

  10. Tylo v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

    55 Cal.App.4th 1379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 18 times
    In Tylo v. Spelling Entertainment Group, Inc., 55 Cal. App. 4th 1379 (Cal. App. 1997), the plaintiff signed a contract to appear in the television series "Melrose Place."

  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  12. Section 1011 - Manner of service

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1011   Cited 80 times
    Authorizing personal service on an attorney

  13. Section 1013 - Requirements for service by mail

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1013   Cited 74 times

    (a) In case of service by mail, the notice or other paper shall be deposited in a post office, mailbox, subpost office, substation, or mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope, with postage paid, addressed to the person on whom it is to be served, at the office address as last given by that person on any document filed in the cause and served on the party making service by mail; otherwise at that party's place of residence.

  14. Section 1010.6 - Electronic service of document

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1010.6   Cited 39 times
    Authorizing trial courts to adopt local rules permitting electronic filing of documents

  15. Rule 2.251 - Electronic service

    Cal. R. 2.251   Cited 15 times

    (a)Authorization for electronic service When a document may be served by mail, express mail, overnight delivery, or fax transmission, the document may be served electronically under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6, Penal Code section 690.5, and the rules in this chapter. For purposes of electronic service made pursuant to Penal Code section 690.5, express consent to electronic service is required.[]= (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2022; previously amended effective January 1, 2007