Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
25 Cal.4th 826 (Cal. 2001) Cited 4,980 times 2 Legal AnalysesConcluding that the gathering and dissemination of pricing information by the petroleum companies through an independent industry service did not imply collusive action where there was no evidence the information was misused as a basis for an unlawful conspiracy; rather, evidence suggested that individual companies used all available resources “to determine capacity, supply, and pricing decisions which would maximize their own individual profits”
Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400
25 Cal.4th 763 (Cal. 2001) Cited 1,221 timesAffirming summary judgment when plaintiffs evidence only raised a speculative possibility that defendant's breaches caused the plaintiff's injuries
Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.
163 Cal.App.4th 327 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 336 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding that elements of a common law disability discrimination claim are the same as those of a FEHA claim
Hanson v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
74 Cal.App.4th 215 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999) Cited 382 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "a finite leave of absence has been considered to be a reasonable accommodation under ADA, provided it is likely that following the leave the employee would be able to perform his or her duties"
Wilson v. County of Orange
169 Cal.App.4th 1185 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 228 times 2 Legal AnalysesFinding employer engaged in interactive process because employee got "exactly what she wanted—albeit after a series of temporary accommodations"
Jogani v. Jogani
141 Cal.App.4th 158 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) Cited 68 timesFinding the requirement of success "is of particular importance," noting that Thomas was decided before New Hampshire, and distinguishing the facts from those in Thomas