§Why CasetextPricing

Mark Fudge vs. City of Laguna Beach, City Council of City of Laguna Beach, And Its Planning Commission

Opposition

2 Cited authorities

  1. Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn.

    19 Cal.App.4th 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 121 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "fees are not authorized for exhibits not used at trial" under section 1033.5, subdivision

  2. Pande v. Chevrontexaco Corporation

    Case No. C-04-05107 JCS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2008)   Cited 5 times

    Case No. C-04-05107 JCS. March 31, 2008 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES [Docket No. 198] JOSEPH SPERO, Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Kiran Pande, brings a Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses (the "Motion") following a jury trial in which she was awarded $5.57 million in damages. Pande now seeks an award of $791,506.61 in attorneys' fees and expenses under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"). Defendant