§Why CasetextPricing

Jamica Garcia vs. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.

Motion to Quash

9 Cited authorities

  1. Valley Bank of Nev. v. Superior Court

    15 Cal.3d 652 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 196 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff bank ordered to produce documents including private customer information must notify customers to enable them to object before disclosing their information

  2. Britt v. Superior Court

    20 Cal.3d 844 (Cal. 1978)   Cited 169 times
    Holding that patient "may not withhold information which relates to any physical or mental condition which they have put in issue"

  3. Vinson v. Superior Court

    43 Cal.3d 833 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 85 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding no right for the attorney to attend the psychiatric examination and leaving that decision to the trial court's discretion

  4. Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini

    93 Cal.App.3d 669 (Cal. Ct. App. 1979)   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the right of a grand jury to so investigate within its lawful sphere," but nevertheless requiring notice to account holder before service of grand jury subpoena on bank

  5. Lantz v. Superior Court

    28 Cal.App.4th 1839 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Docket No. F020911. October 13, 1994. Appeal from Superior Court of Kern County, No. 220763 RDR, Clarence Westra, Jr., Judge. COUNSEL Carol A. Sobel, Paul L. Hoffman and Silvia A. Argueta for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. B.C. Barmann, County Counsel, and James H. Thebeau, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION ARDAIZ, P.J. Section 1985.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides a procedural mechanism designed to give notice to a "consumer" when the consumer's "personal

  6. Davis v. Superior Court

    7 Cal.App.4th 1008 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 32 times
    In Davis, the court recognized that by "limiting [plaintiff's] claim for emotional distress to pain and suffering associated with stated physical injuries, and by explaining that [the medical provider in question] provided no treatment in connection with the injuries for which compensation was sought, petitioner established that it is not reasonably probable that the records are directly relevant to the condition she placed in issue."

  7. Tylo v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

    55 Cal.App.4th 1379 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 18 times
    In Tylo v. Spelling Entertainment Group, Inc., 55 Cal. App. 4th 1379 (Cal. App. 1997), the plaintiff signed a contract to appear in the television series "Melrose Place."

  8. Section 1985.3 - Service on consumer whose records are being sought

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1985.3   Cited 110 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Subpoenaing consumer's personal records

  9. Section 1987.1 - Motion for order quashing, modifying or directing compliance with subpoena including protective orders

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1987.1   Cited 63 times
    Setting forth procedure to quash subpoena duces tecum