31 Cited authorities

Rent-A-Ctr. v. Jackson
561 U.S. 63 (2010) Cited 2,713 times 65 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an arbitration provision is severable from the remainder of the contract," even where the contract containing the arbitration provision is itself an arbitration agreement (quoting Buckeye , 546 U.S. at 445, 126 S.Ct. 1204 )
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
500 U.S. 20 (1991) Cited 3,053 times 59 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration
Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.
539 U.S. 52 (2003) Cited 498 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding the FAA applies to all transactions "affecting commerce-words of art that ordinarily signal the broadest permissible exercise of Congress' Commerce Clause power"
Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.
24 Cal.4th 83 (Cal. 2000) Cited 1,792 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable
Rosenthal v. Great W. Fin. Secs. Corp.
14 Cal.4th 394 (Cal. 1996) Cited 795 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding fraud in the inducement "occurs when the promisor knows what he is signing but his consent is induced by fraud"
Mercuro v. Superior Court
96 Cal.App.4th 167 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 261 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding arbitration provision substantively unconscionable where it "compel[ed] arbitration of the claims employees are more likely to bring"
Lane v. Francis Capital Mgmt. LLC
224 Cal.App.4th 676 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014) Cited 137 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding failing to attach rules to arbitration agreement did not render the agreement procedurally unconscionable because rules were easily accessible on the internet and the plaintiff did not lack means or capacity to retrieve them
Hoover v. American Income Life Insurance Co.
206 Cal.App.4th 1193 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 144 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the rights accorded by [Labor Code] sections 203, 1194, and 2802 may not be subject to negotiation or waiver .... For an arbitration clause to operate for individual statutory claims, there must be a clear and unmistakable waiver of a judicial forum."
Bruni v. Didion
160 Cal.App.4th 1272 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 160 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiffs are not bound by Evid. Code, § 622 to a recital that they had read a sample copy of a warranty booklet"
Dotson v. Amgen, Inc.
181 Cal.App.4th 975 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) Cited 147 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "discovery limitations are an integral and permissible part of the arbitration process"

Nazanen Jamili vs. The Irvine Company, LLC

31 Cited authorities

Holding that "an arbitration provision is severable from the remainder of the contract," even where the contract containing the arbitration provision is itself an arbitration agreement (quoting Buckeye , 546 U.S. at 445, 126 S.Ct. 1204 )

Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration

Holding the FAA applies to all transactions "affecting commerce-words of art that ordinarily signal the broadest permissible exercise of Congress' Commerce Clause power"

Holding unilateral arbitration provision substantively unconscionable

Holding fraud in the inducement "occurs when the promisor knows what he is signing but his consent is induced by fraud"

Holding arbitration provision substantively unconscionable where it "compel[ed] arbitration of the claims employees are more likely to bring"

Holding failing to attach rules to arbitration agreement did not render the agreement procedurally unconscionable because rules were easily accessible on the internet and the plaintiff did not lack means or capacity to retrieve them

Holding that "the rights accorded by [Labor Code] sections 203, 1194, and 2802 may not be subject to negotiation or waiver .... For an arbitration clause to operate for individual statutory claims, there must be a clear and unmistakable waiver of a judicial forum."

Holding plaintiffs are not bound by Evid. Code, § 622 to a recital that they had read a sample copy of a warranty booklet"

Holding that "discovery limitations are an integral and permissible part of the arbitration process"