12 Cited authorities

Hill v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
7 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 1994) Cited 659 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that students' consent to drug tests as a condition of participating in athletics barred their privacy claims
Valley Bank of Nev. v. Superior Court
15 Cal.3d 652 (Cal. 1975) Cited 196 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding plaintiff bank ordered to produce documents including private customer information must notify customers to enable them to object before disclosing their information
Lipton v. Superior Court
48 Cal.App.4th 1599 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996) Cited 104 times
Recognizing that a reserve of money to deal with the claim cannot be equated with an admission of liability or the value of the claim
Burrows v. Superior Court
13 Cal.3d 238 (Cal. 1974) Cited 186 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records under the California Constitution
Obregon v. Superior Court
67 Cal.App.4th 424 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) Cited 78 times
Reviewing court first determines "whether substantial evidence supports the factual basis on which the trial court acted," then determines whether the order to impose sanctions was an abuse of discretion "in light of those facts"
Volkswagen v. Superior Ct.
139 Cal.App.4th 1481 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) Cited 41 times 4 Legal Analyses
In Volkswagen, the information sought by the defendant through discovery concerned a claim for damages being asserted against it. It would be unreasonable for a plaintiff to be permitted to assert damages against a third party and at the same time to withhold evidence that might relate to his claim.
Fortunato v. Superior Court
114 Cal.App.4th 475 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003) Cited 32 times 1 Legal Analyses
Concluding that individual did not waive privilege against forced disclosure of tax returns by complying with court order because it was "not a voluntary relinquishment, and does not, therefore, effect a waiver of the privilege"
Colonial Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Superior Court
31 Cal.3d 785 (Cal. 1982) Cited 60 times 2 Legal Analyses
Ruling that based on California's version of Rule 26(b), encompassing an identical minimal relevance standard, "Colonial's suggestion that the discovery of other insureds whose claims were negotiated by Sharkey will not yield relevant, admissible evidence, is patently meritless"
Calcor Space Facility, Inc. v. Superior Court
53 Cal.App.4th 216 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997) Cited 34 times
Requesting party bears burden to determine "the manner in which [the responding party] maintains its records"
Davies v. Superior Court
36 Cal.3d 291 (Cal. 1984) Cited 34 times
In Davies, a petitioner sought disclosure of California Highway Patrol accident data, which came under the confidentiality coverage of California Vehicle Code § 20012.
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 23,013 times 16 Legal Analyses
Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
Section 1
Cal. Const. art. I § 1 Cited 1,083 times 1 Legal Analyses
Providing "[a]ll people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights," including the right of "privacy"

Aztec Foreclosure Corporation vs. Keefe Roberts

12 Cited authorities

Holding that students' consent to drug tests as a condition of participating in athletics barred their privacy claims

Holding plaintiff bank ordered to produce documents including private customer information must notify customers to enable them to object before disclosing their information

Recognizing that a reserve of money to deal with the claim cannot be equated with an admission of liability or the value of the claim

Finding a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records under the California Constitution

Reviewing court first determines "whether substantial evidence supports the factual basis on which the trial court acted," then determines whether the order to impose sanctions was an abuse of discretion "in light of those facts"

Concluding that individual did not waive privilege against forced disclosure of tax returns by complying with court order because it was "not a voluntary relinquishment, and does not, therefore, effect a waiver of the privilege"

Ruling that based on California's version of Rule 26(b), encompassing an identical minimal relevance standard, "Colonial's suggestion that the discovery of other insureds whose claims were negotiated by Sharkey will not yield relevant, admissible evidence, is patently meritless"

Requesting party bears burden to determine "the manner in which [the responding party] maintains its records"

In Davies, a petitioner sought disclosure of California Highway Patrol accident data, which came under the confidentiality coverage of California Vehicle Code § 20012.

Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

Providing "[a]ll people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights," including the right of "privacy"