§Why CasetextPricing

Andrea Knohl-Trider vs. Rebecca Foster

Opposition

11 Cited authorities

  1. Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty.

    1 Cal.5th 1132 (Cal. 2016)   Cited 270 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employers and property owners owe members of a worker's household a duty to prevent take-home exposure to asbestos

  2. Rowland v. Christian

    69 Cal.2d 108 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 1,269 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 1714 superceded prior common-law negligence rules

  3. Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.

    158 Cal.App.4th 1582 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 281 times
    Affirming trial court's award of fees, without allocation, where contract and misrepresentation claims arose from same operative facts

  4. Crisci v. the Security Ins. Co. of New Haven, Connecticut

    66 Cal.2d 425 (Cal. 1967)   Cited 435 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing only requires an insurer to accept a reasonable settlement

  5. Kelly v. New West Federal Savings

    49 Cal.App.4th 659 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 119 times
    Granting of motions in limine prevented jury from hearing crucial evidence

  6. Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co.

    79 Cal.App.3d 325 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 132 times
    In Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co. (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 325 (Hyatt), the plaintiff was driving in the right lane on a highway late at night when his vehicle apparently struck a glancing blow against the defendant's boat trailer, which was parked alongside the highway, then skidded or rolled into a telephone pole.

  7. Capelouto v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

    7 Cal.3d 889 (Cal. 1972)   Cited 146 times
    Holding that pain and suffering "can be translated into monetary loss only with great difficulty"

  8. Clemens v. American Warranty Corp.

    193 Cal.App.3d 444 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 52 times
    Observing that the purpose of a motion in limine " 'is to avoid the obviously futile attempt to "unring the bell" ' "

  9. Kessler v. Gray

    77 Cal.App.3d 284 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 45 times
    Applying this rule to improperly sustained hearsay objection resulting in lack of evidence to support judgment

  10. Fatica v. Superior Court

    99 Cal.App.4th 350 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 13 times
    In Fatica, plaintiff sought to introduce testimony of his orthopedic surgeon regarding his injuries after a car accident.