Nestle v. City of Santa Monica
6 Cal.3d 920 (Cal. 1972) Cited 469 times
In Nestle we held, inter alia, that a nuisance action based on airport noise was improperly dismissed on the basis of government immunity, and suggested that the plaintiffs on remand might be able to demonstrate a continuing nuisance.
Justus v. Atchison
19 Cal.3d 564 (Cal. 1977) Cited 260 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that statute allowing for tort recovery for wrongful death (C.C.P. § 377) did not provide recovery for the death of a fetus; however, P.C. §§ 187 and 270 address death and injury to unborn child
Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.
205 Cal.App.4th 1103 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 46 times 1 Legal Analyses
Reviewing court must accept "the truth of the allegations in plaintiffs' proposed amended complaints"
Mabie v. Hyatt
61 Cal.App.4th 581 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) Cited 51 times
Holding "in California coupling a justified charge with an unjustified charge does not shield a party from a malicious prosecution claim on the unjustified charge."