§Why CasetextPricing

Robert A Ferrante vs. Arash Shirdel

Motion to Compel Deposition (Oral or Written)

8 Cited authorities

  1. Parker v. Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc.

    149 Cal.App.4th 285 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 117 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Affirming award of one-third of sanctions requested

  2. Deyo v. Kilbourne

    84 Cal.App.3d 771 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 154 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Deyo, it was held that the materiality of questions propounded to a particular claim or a defense should be considered as a factor in assessing the propriety of entering a dismissal or a default judgment for failure to answer.

  3. Collisson Kaplan v. Hartunian

    21 Cal.App.4th 1611 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 55 times
    Imposing terminating sanctions as a first penalty

  4. Housing Authority v. Gomez

    26 Cal.App.3d 366 (Cal. Ct. App. 1972)   Cited 11 times

    Docket No. 29045. June 26, 1972. Appeal from Superior Court of Alameda County, No. 381080, Gordon L. Minder and Leonard J. Dieden, Judges. COUNSEL Field, DeGoff, Huppert MacGowan, Peter A. Huppert and James L. Weinberger for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Davis, Craig Bartalini, H. Theodore Craig III and Daniel E. Cummins for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent. OPINION ROUSE, J. On July 3, 1968, plaintiff Housing Authority of the City of Alameda commenced this action against defendant

  5. Section 2025.450 - Motion to compel deponent testimony and production

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2025.450   Cited 87 times
    Providing sanctions for failure of a party deponent "to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document … described in the deposition notice"

  6. Section 2030.290 - Failure to serve timely response; motion for order compelling response

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.290   Cited 82 times
    Mandating sanctions "against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust"

  7. Section 2030.210 - Methods of responding; requirements

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2030.210   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) The party to whom interrogatories have been propounded shall respond in writing under oath separately to each interrogatory by any of the following: (1) An answer containing the information sought to be discovered. (2) An exercise of the party's option to produce writings. (3) An objection to the particular interrogatory. (b) In the first paragraph of the response immediately below the title of the case, there shall appear the identity of the responding party, the set number, and the identity

  8. Section 2025.260 - Motion that deponent attend deposition at place more distant than permitted

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2025.260   Cited 11 times

    (a) A party desiring to take the deposition of a natural person who is a party to the action or an officer, director, managing agent, or employee of a party may make a motion for an order that the deponent attend for deposition at a place that is more distant than that permitted under Section 2025.250. This motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040. (b) In exercising its discretion to grant or deny this motion, the court shall take into consideration any